Original source · versioned page text
Appendix E - Stormwater Management Plan
Attached to the e-mail Multiple Housing – Type 3 Retirement & Special Needs (10 units) - MCU17/0551.
The original of this document is very large (13.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn4.4.4.2 GENERIC NODE
A generic treatment node was used for the proposed treatment system for the Aged Care Facility. The following
treatment efficiencies were modelled.
Table 4-3: Generic Node Treatment Removal Efficiency (Aged Care Facility)
Treatment Removal
Pollutant
Efficiency
TSS 90%
TP 60%
TN 45%
GP 90%
The future proposed stormwater quality treatment system for the Aged Care Facility must achieve this pollutant
removal efficiency or greater. This is to be demonstrated in future Development Applications for the Aged Care
Facility.
4.4.4.3 POND NODE
A separate MUSIC model was configured, including the WCQP to determine Hydraulic Residence Time (HRT), which is
an important feature of the pond required for avoiding outbreaks of algae (as discussed below). Table 4-4 indicates the
pond node configuration adopted in MUSIC. Further details of the WQCP are indicated on the Drawing No. 16-001014-
402 in Appendix G.
Table 4-4: Pond Node Configuration
Pond Parameter Central Basin
Surface Area (m²) 1,940
Extended Detention Depth (m) 0.40
Permanent Pool Volume (m³) 1,840
Notional Detention Time (hrs) 48.4
Equivalent Pipe Diameter (mm) 55
Since the Issue A report only the permanent pool volume has been changed from 1,845m2 to 1,840m2. As this is
such a minor change the previous HRT analysis of the pond is considered to be still applicable (i.e. no update to
the modelling is required).
Hydraulic Residence Time/Turnover Period
An important factor in determining pond sustainability is the turnover period, or Hydraulic Residence Time (HRT). Ponds
with high residence times are considered to be at risk of algal bloom and poor water quality.
Water By Design’s Urban Lakes Discussion Paper-Managing the Risk of Cyanobacterial Blooms dated Febuary 2012
recommends 10 to 15 days Hydraulic Residence Time for a lake. Other Queensland publication recommend 20 days
maximum hydraulic retention time. As such, we have recommended a Performance Indicator of a maximum Hydraulic
Residence Time of 15 days for the Central Basin / WQCP.
Using a simplistic approach as detailed in WSUD Engineering Principles – Stormwater (2005), the 20th percentile
Hydraulic Residence Time of 12 days was determined over a 30-year period (1973-2003) based on available data. Refer
to Table 4-5 below.
16-001014-01B | STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN COOROY RETIREMENT COMMUNITY, TRADING POST
(SWMP) | PALM LAKE RESORTS ROAD, COOROY | 20
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.