Original source · versioned page text
Appendix E - Stormwater Management Plan
Attached to the e-mail Multiple Housing – Type 3 Retirement & Special Needs (10 units) - MCU17/0551.
The original of this document is very large (13.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnSummary
Table A and B below indicate a comparison between existing and developed flood levels and
velocities within the existing channel on site.
Table A – Flood Level Comparison
Cross Section Ex WSL (m AHD) Dev WSL (m AHD) Difference (m)
A 98.77 98.67 -0.09
B 98.58 98.57 -0.01
C 98.30 98.30 0.00
D 97.97 97.95 -0.02
As indicated in Table A there are reductions in flood levels at each cross section location within the
existing swale due to the peak flow mitigation measures proposed. It is also noted that flood levels
will be significantly lower since they overtop the left channel embankment and sheet flows across
the site boundary (under both existing and developed conditions).
Table B –Velocity Comparison
Cross Section Ex Velocity (m/s) Des Velocity (m/s) Difference (m)
A 0.68 0.95 0.26
B 0.73 0.87 0.14
C 0.72 0.94 0.22
D 0.69 0.68 -0.01
While velocities within the existing swale have been slightly increased. The design velocity is less
than 1.0m/s which is not expected to cause scour.
Proposed Channel Capacity Immediately Downstream of Culvert Outlet
A check of the capacity of the proposed channel immediately downstream of the proposed culverts
was determined using Manning’s calculations (refer to the section below). Results indicate that flood
levels during the 1% AEP storm are well below the proposed level of the Caretakers building (by
more than 2m). Therefore, in the instance that Caretaker’s building floor levels are adjusted slightly
for detailed design, the building will not be impacting by flooding from the WQCP outflows.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.