Council archive · source document
07/1259 - Referral Agency Response (Concurrence & Advice) - DNRW [As Published] · 132007.1259
Queensland
’s Government
*
Author Nick Hill
Council Reference 2007/1259
NRW Reference 1C0707NAM0013 / NOO7664 —_—- FOF
Directorate / Unit Planning and Environment Department of
Phone 54 512 287 Natural Resources and Water
22 August 2007
Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Shire Council
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN QLD 4565
Attention Kerri Coyle
Dear Sir/Madam
PROPOSED MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE (VISITOR ACCOMMODATION TYPE 4,
COMMERCIAL BUSINESS TYPE 1, RETAIL BUSINESS TYPE 2 & ENTERTAINMENT &
DINING BUSINES TYPE 1) AND RECONFIGURATION OF A LOT—LOTS 8, 9, & 10
P9315 AND LOT 76 MCH2969—251, 251A, 217 & 219 DAVID LOW WAY, PEREGIAN
BEACH—REFERRAL AGENCY RESPONSE
With reference to the above application, the Chief Executive of the Department of Natural
Resources and Water (NRW)—concurrence and advice agency for the application—advises
as follows.
CONCURRENCE AGENCY MATTERS
Vegetation Management Act 1999
The concurrence agency response for the application, prepared pursuant to section 3.3.16
of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 for the purposes of the Vegetation Management Act
1999, is enclosed.
ADVICE AGENCY MATTERS
State Planning Policy 2/02 -— Planning and Managing Development Involving Acid
Sulfate Soils (SPP 2/02)
Details regarding the extent of excavation or filling of land below 5 m AHD required for this
proposed development has not been provided. It is noted that car parking for approximately
166 cars is proposed underneath the accommodation and commercial buildings, and along
the internal access driveway.
An Acid Sufate Soil (ASS) investigation—undertaken by Butler Partners, 18 June 2007—
has been provided with the application. This investigation identified silty clay soils requiring
management at approximately 2.2m AHD in the south western, lower lying portion of the
subject site (surface level approx RL 3.1 m). Although these soils have a low level of
acidity, any disturbance of them will require Tan agement in accordance with SPP2/02.
Department of Natural
Resources & Water
Centenary Square Building,
Currie Street, Nambour. Q 4560
RUMaAVED
207 PO Box 573, Nambour. Q 4560
2 4 AUG Telephone + 61 7 5451 2222
NOOSA Facsimile + 61 7 5451 2260
SHIRE COUNCIL Website www.nw.qid.gov.au
ABN 83 705 539 586
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
The tocation of the proposed under ground car parking appears to be located on a elevated portion of the subject site ranging from 4-6 m HAD, with an anticipated finish level of 5.2 m AHD. Accordingly, excavations associated with the proposed underground car park, appear to not warrant ASS management strategies. NRW is available to provide further advice on ASS and their management at subsequent stages of the proposed development—operational works—should earthworks involve disturbances of the lower lying soils containing potential acidity. THIRD PARTY ADVICE MATTERS Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 NRW also takes this opportunity to advise you of an applicant's responsibility under the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003. Under section 23 of the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 a person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage (the "cultural heritage duty of care”). Maximum penalties for breaching the duty of care are $750,000 for a corporation and $75,000 for an individual. The applicant will ensure compliance with the cultural heritage duty of care if the applicant is acting in accordance with the gazetted cultural heritage duty of care guidelines. An assessment of the proposed activity against the duty of care guidelines will help determine whether or to what extent Aboriginal cultural heritage may be harmed by the proposed development. It will also help determine if the applicant needs to undertake a search of the cultural heritage database and register. If following an assessment of the duty of care guidelines the applicant believes cultural heritage may be harmed by the proposed activity, the applicant should contact the Cultural Heritage Coordination Unit for further advice on (07) 323 83838 or e-mail cultural. [email protected] information on cultural heritage, together with a copy of the duty of care guidelines and cultural heritage search forms, may also be _ obtained from www.nnw.gid.gov.au/cultural_heritage/index. html | look forward to receiving a copy of the decision notice for the application in due course. A copy of this Referral Agency Response has been issued to the applicant. Should you have any questions about this matter please contact Mr Nick Hill on (07) 5451 2287, quoting the reference number ICO707NAMO0013. Yours sincerely Vip Nick Hill A/Senior Officer (Planning & Environment) South East Region (Nambour) CC. Scanlon Property Group C/- PMM Group Pty Ltd PO Box 1559 FORTITUDE VALLEY QLD 4006 Attention: Fiona Wallin Department of Natural Resources and Water Page 2 of 4
Page 3
Department of Natural Resources and Water — Referral agency response Given under Section 3.3.16 of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 1. Application details 1.1. Applicant’s name Scanlon Property Group C/- PMM Group Pty Ltd 1.2. Property description Lot 8 on P9315, Lot 9 on P9315, Lot 10 on P9315, and Lot 76 on MCH2969 1.3. Development type Material Change of Use (MCU) 1.4. Assessment manager (AM) Noosa Council 1.5. Assessment manager reference 2007/1259 1.6. Referral date 26 July 2007 1.7. Our references eLVAS — 2007/007826 : File —-GYV/001008 Trackjob ~ ICO707NAMO013 2. Concurrence agency response The chief executive of the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW) would like to inform the assessment manager that NRW has no concurrence agency requirements in regard to the application. 3. Reasons for the concurrence agency response NRW has assessed the application against the Concurrence Agency Policy for Material Change of Use (MCU) 20 November 2006 and has determined that the application meets the requirements of Criteria Table B because clearing as a result of the MCU will only occur— e For an urban purpose in an urban area on freehold land; and e Inremnant vegetation that does not contain an endangered regional ecosystem, where the land is not shown on a PMAV. 4. Delegated officer signature Y Mr Brett Johnson Senior Vegetation Management Officer South East Region, NRW 21 August 2007 Department of Natural Resources and Water Page 3 of 3
Used in these records
07/1259 - Referral Agency Response (Concurrence & Advice) - DNRW [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 155 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.