Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU15/0017 - Development Application

of 229

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (48.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville

8 Conclusions and Recommendations

 

This Town Planning Report accompanies an application by QIC Noosa Civic Pty Ltd seeking a Development
Permit for a Material Change of Use for Commercial Business (Type 3 — Veterinary) to facilitate the
development of a veterinary associated with an existing pet shop within an existing tenancy of the Emporium
precinct at Noosa Civic.

Technical assessments have been undertaken with regard to the proposed development in order to assess
potential impacts and to address the relevant planning scheme codes used by Council to assess the
proposed development.

The information provided in this Town Planning Report demonstrates that the proposed development
complies with all applicable provisions of the relevant planning framework.

According to Section 326 of the SPA:

“(1) The assessment manager's decision must not conflict with a relevant instrument
unless—

(a) the conflict is necessary to ensure the decision complies with a State
planning regulatory provision; or

(b) _ there are sufficient grounds to justify the decision, despite the conflict; or
(c) _ the conflict arises because of a conflict between—

(i) 2 or more relevant instruments of the same type, and the decision
best achieves the purposes of the instruments; or

(ii) | 2 or more aspects of any 1 relevant instrument, and the decision
best achieves the purposes of the instrument.”

The proposed development complies, and is consistent with the relevant and applicable provisions of the
Statutory town planning framework. To the extent that any conflict is considered to arise, the extent of any
inconsistency or conflict with the applicable planning scheme provisions is considered to be minor in nature.
Sufficient planning grounds have been identified which justifies any potential conflict

We therefore recommend that Council favourably consider the proposed development and approve the
proposed development application, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions.

Yours faithfully
CARDNO HRP

 

February 2015 Cardno HRP 30
Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0017 - Development Application.pdf · 48.2 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.