Original source · versioned page text
MCU15/0017 - Development Application
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (48.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Town Planning Report 28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville 8 Conclusions and Recommendations This Town Planning Report accompanies an application by QIC Noosa Civic Pty Ltd seeking a Development Permit for a Material Change of Use for Commercial Business (Type 3 — Veterinary) to facilitate the development of a veterinary associated with an existing pet shop within an existing tenancy of the Emporium precinct at Noosa Civic. Technical assessments have been undertaken with regard to the proposed development in order to assess potential impacts and to address the relevant planning scheme codes used by Council to assess the proposed development. The information provided in this Town Planning Report demonstrates that the proposed development complies with all applicable provisions of the relevant planning framework. According to Section 326 of the SPA: “(1) The assessment manager's decision must not conflict with a relevant instrument unless— (a) the conflict is necessary to ensure the decision complies with a State planning regulatory provision; or (b) _ there are sufficient grounds to justify the decision, despite the conflict; or (c) _ the conflict arises because of a conflict between— (i) 2 or more relevant instruments of the same type, and the decision best achieves the purposes of the instruments; or (ii) | 2 or more aspects of any 1 relevant instrument, and the decision best achieves the purposes of the instrument.” The proposed development complies, and is consistent with the relevant and applicable provisions of the Statutory town planning framework. To the extent that any conflict is considered to arise, the extent of any inconsistency or conflict with the applicable planning scheme provisions is considered to be minor in nature. Sufficient planning grounds have been identified which justifies any potential conflict We therefore recommend that Council favourably consider the proposed development and approve the proposed development application, subject to reasonable and relevant conditions. Yours faithfully CARDNO HRP February 2015 Cardno HRP 30
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.