Original source · versioned page text
2022-09-06 P&E Agenda - Item 5 - Attachment 1 - Six Mile Creek Bridge Replacement Offset Report - TMR
The original of this document is very large (10.7 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Legislation/ policy/plans Legislative jurisdiction Intent Applicability to proposed action
e) Effectively account for and manage the risks of the offset not
succeeding
f) Be additional to what is already required, determined by law or
planning regulations or agreed to under other schemes or
programs (this does not preclude the recognition of State or
territory offsets that may be suitable as offsets under the Act
for the same action)
g) Be efficient, effective, timely, transparent, scientifically robust
and reasonable
h) Have transparent governance arrangements including being
able to be readily measured, monitored, audited and enforced
(Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population
and Communities (DSEWPaC) 2012a).
The Australian Government defines offsets as measures that
compensate for the significant residual impacts of an action on the
environment (DSEWPaC 2012a).
Significant impact MNES The purpose of the MNES Guidelines are to assist any person who Assessment of MNES against the MNES Guidelines
guidelines 1.1 – Matters of proposes to take an action to decide whether or not they should facilitate the determination of a significant residual impact
National Environmental submit a referral to the DAWE for a decision by the Australian to MNES. The outcomes of this assessment have been
Significance: Government Environment Minister on whether assessment and presented in Section 2 and Appendix A (Section 6.1).
Environment Protection approval is required under the EPBC Act.
and Biodiversity The MNES Guidelines outlines a ‘self-assessment’ process,
Conservation Act 1999 including detailed criteria, to assist persons in deciding whether or
(MNES Guidelines) not referral may be required. Important terms and phrases are
explained.
EPBC Act Referral MNES The purpose of the guideline is to assist any person who proposes Assessment of MNES against the guidelines facilitate the
Guidelines for the to take an action to decide whether or not they should submit a determination of a significant residual impact to Koala.
vulnerable koala referral to the DAWE for a decision by the Australian Government The outcomes of this assessment have been presented
(combined populations of Environment Minister on whether assessment and approval is in Section 2.3.1 and Appendix A (Section 6.1.2).
Queensland, New South required under the EPBC Act in relation to the Koala.
Wales and the Australian These guidelines outline a ‘self-assessment’ process, including
Capital Territory), (DotE detailed criteria, to assist persons in deciding whether or not referral
2014) may be required.
Project number 511784 File Six Mile Creek - Matters of National Environmental Significance Report 2021-12-03 Revision 1 9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.