Skip to the record
Accept no substitutions.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Ian Suter

of 27

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (10.2 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

4. NON COM~L1ANCE WITH RElEYi\NTJ)I.~ri!,!!NG              INSTRUIV!ENTS;

The Applicant    has completely     failed to address the numerous       and significant     potential   impacts of the
proposed     Development      on the adjoining   School. The following     specific areas of non-compliance             are
noted:


 Code Objective                      Developer's    Assessment             Objectors'      Assessment

 RECONFIGURING A LOT CODE

 09 The subdivision layout is        09 Complies:                          Does not Comply
 designed to facilitate              The proposal will comply              The phrase "reasonably        applicable"     is
 linkages with adjoining sites       where reasonably applicable.          unclear and the specific linkages with
 in the immediate    area.                                                 adjoining sites in the immediate         area
                                                                           have not been considered or
                                                                           adequately addressed.

 010 Where the lots are to be        010 Complies:                         Does not Comply
 used for Industrial business        Landscaped buffering has              The layout does not provide for
 or Commercial     business          been provided along all               appropriate      buffer areas, to mitigate
 uses, the layout provides for       boundaries adjoining the              possible impacts on the adjacent
 appropriate    buffer areas, to     school to the east.                   School. Landscape buffering is
 mitigate possible impacts on                                              insufficient    and ineffective    to mitigate
 nearby residences or other                                                the negative impacts, including those
 noise sensitive uses                                                      of fugitive emissions, of the
                                                                           Development.

 012 An adequate and                 SI2.1- 12.2 Complies                  Does not Comply
 accessible water supply is          Will comply as applicable.           The Applicant has not adequately
 provided for fire fighting                                                addressed the issue of fire safety and
 purposes.                                                                 its potential    impacts, particularly
                                                                          given the proximity of the
                                                                           Development       to the adjacent School.

032 Access easements are in          S32.1 Complies                       Does not Comply
appropriate     locations for        It is considered that the            The proposed access is not
safe access and egress, and          proposed access easement             appropriate      for the Development         and
supply appropriate      widths       has been designed in                 does not provide safe access and
and levels of service for the        accordance with Sections 2           egress nor does it provide for the
number of vehicles that will         and 3 of PSPSEngineering             appropriate      level of safety of school
utilise them                         Design Standards - Roads,            children given its proximity        to the
                                     Drainage and Earthworks.             School

033 Traffic generated by the         S33.1 Complies                       Does not Comply
development      is within the       The development    will comply       "reasonably applicable"        is
acceptable capacity of               where reasonably applicable.         indeterminate.      The proposed
external roads and does not                                               Development        does have an adverse
have an adverse impact                                                    impact upon the functioning          of the
upon the functioning      of the                                          road network. The Applicant has




                                                                                                                        12

Used in these records

About this file

File size
10.2 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Ian Suter.pdf · 10.2 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.