Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Ian Suter

of 27

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (10.2 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

'.




      Code Objective                        Developer's      Assessment                  Objectors'     Assessment

      road system                                                                        proposed access and egress point
                                                                                         does impact adversely on the safety
                                                                                         and operation      of the Eumundi-Noosa
                                                                                         Road.

      014 Provision is made for             014 Complies                                 Does not Comply
      pedestrian and vehicular              Can comply via condition                     The Applicants response is
      queues at conflict points;            where applicable.                            inconsistent     and vague. The
                                                                                         Development       will significantly       affect
                                                                                         traffic on the Eumundi-Noosa            Road,
                                                                                         the roundabout      outside the School
                                                                                         and pedestrian children on the
                                                                                         footpath     entrance in the event of
                                                                                         queuing to access the proposed
                                                                                         Development.      The Applicant has
                                                                                         provided no objective analysis of the
                                                                                         likely queuing frequency or extent.
                                                                                         The Applicant's     response      is indicative
                                                                                         of the fact that the Applicant has not
                                                                                         conducted the required analysis and
                                                                                         expects the Assessment Manager to
                                                                                         determine      what is appropriate,         which
                                                                                         is unacceptable     in the already
                                                                                         challenging circumstances.

      017 Car parking areas are             017 Complies                                 Does not Comply
      landscaped ...                        Car parking areas have been                  Cannot be compliant          as they do not
                                            suitably landscaped.                         meet the requirements          of the
                                                                                         Landscaping Code Objective 028.


     The Application      does not comply        in the areas outlined      above and has completely                failed to address
     adequately      the potential   impacts on the adjoining         School. At 6.2 of its Town Planning Report the
     Applicant    makes unfounded,       unqualified    and unsupported        opinion      as to the potential        impacts on the
     adjoining School. The assessment is neither comprehensive                 nor soundly validated for example:


        Applicants    Response / Assertion                        Objectors'    Response

        1. The proposed         petrol   store    building   is   This is a statement        of fact without        justification      as to
            located more than 10m form the school                 its relevance.
            boundary
                                                                  10m is in effect too close to the School boundary                          to
                                                                  ensure    the    safety     of    the    children     attending        the
                                                                  School.   We have demonstrated                 elsewhere          in this
                                                                  document        that     international      and     Australian        best




                                                                                                                                             23

Used in these records

About this file

File size
10.2 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Ian Suter.pdf · 10.2 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.