Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

2015-10-19 General Committee Agenda

of 18

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   19 OCTOBER 2015




                                       Page 7 of 18

Final Evaluation

                                                                                                               Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet

                                                        ContractNo;                         |_1816T017_
                                                        Rea                                |Dr Pages Road :  \d Kinmond Creek Road Construction
                                                         ees                               [Upgrade
                                                             cai —_—_|                                                ae
                                                   No. |NAME OF TENDERER                                          lexcl of GS                 a
                                                     1([SGQPytte                C—C“‘“CC*dSCC#S4, 758,333}                                  ‘      *     2     =      a      2     «      "     a      ~
                                                     2  [Shadforths Civil Engineering                         i         ($4,659,630)    ae               =            7           =            =           a
                                                     3L         _                _                            i=               at}          The ratings:
                                                    4L                                                        AE                =i}          +0 (zero) = Unacceptable a fail for that criteria and extreme risk
                                                     SSS SS                                                                                  +20 (twenty) = Very Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
                                                     6]                                                       lL                  a          * 40 (forty) = Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
                                                     a                                                        ie                  i          +60 (sixty) = Good ~ the content of the submission for that criteria is meritable and will need to be monitored if awarded
                                                     et                                                       on                  a          += 80 (eighty) = Very Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
                                                     rere eee                                                                   ny]          + 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptonal - the content of the submission for that criteria is flawless / outstanding and most advantageous
                                                    77 ——===a=a=aaz- ===
                                                    11                                                        a                 =f          Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
                                                    121                                                      of:                =]
                                                    13                                                        |                   |
                                                    141                                                       tL                  |
                                                    a
                                                        NON-CONFORMING TENDERS                                                                                                      Number of Tenders Evaluated
                                                        r                                                     [Do not     evaluate
                                                                                                                             1                   2
                                                        —                                                                           Shadforths Civil
                                                           mecemeemcseaenes               |     ions             vs" |      ce | "so |           as |
                                                        DESCRIPTION                                                      Resultant            Resultant
                                                        Probity Plan Criteria exactly +

                                                      Total Technical Score                                   po AS
                                                        Normalised Technical Score (Tn)               Lt TS
                                                        PART - Price element                                 | soar id | Oenaigeerinn —|
                                                        hinnerir                                                                LL                 |
                                                       |Average Fees (Pav) $2.00...             $4,709,082
                                                       Price Score                                                    99                   101
                                                       Normalised Price Score (Pn)                                    98                    100
                                                           ghted Price Score (P

                                                           ments
                                                       OTHER DETAILS
                                                           Assesment panel member 1          Nicholas Wellwoc
                                                           Assesment panel member 2             \da      to
                                                           Assesment panel member 3            Craig Eldridge
                                                           Assesment panel member 4            Rod W      ns
                                                           Assesment panel member 5           Mike Bryett (GH D)
                                                           Assesment panel member 6          Cncl WH&S Off                _       The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
                                                        QBSA LICENCE CHECKED (if applicable)                                                           Contract Administrator's signature:         = __

15167017 - Evaluation Workbook Alternative B pavement Moy Pocket PANEL (2).xIsx                                                                Page 1                                                                                                                                     14/10/2015

                                                                                                                                                                                        Page 7 of 18
Log in to download the original file

2015-10-19 General Committee Agenda(PDF, 1MB).pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.