Council archive · source document
Response to Information Request · MCU23/0139
Date: 14 February 24 The Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council, PO Box 141 Tewantin QLD 4565 Via Email ([email protected]) Attention: Samuel Osakwe Dear Sir, RE: Response to Information Request - 15 Olivine St, Cooroy (MCU23/0139) I refer to Council’s information request sent on 17 November 2023 in relation to the above-mentioned application. We hereby provide a response, in full, to the items raised in the request as detailed below: Issue – Laneway Dedication The proposed development includes access from Olivine Lane. Performance Outcome 17 of the Cooroy Local Plan Code requires a 2-metre resumption from the laneway frontage for widening is provided and constructed to the appropriate standard. The submitted documentation does not indicate the necessary dedication and widening works. Information Request 1. Provide amended plans that indicate the required 2m road dedication along the Olivine Lane frontage. 2. Provide preliminary plans demonstrating the extent of external frontage works. The plans must be prepared by a suitably qualified person (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland) and include: a. widening of the existing Olivine Lane formation with seal and kerb & channel. The works must be designed in accordance with Council standards and the specific site requirements. b. transitions at either end to smoothly match with the existing formation, kerb line and grades. c. conveyance of stormwater runoff longitudinally along the lane without adversely affecting adjoining or opposing properties. d. any required alterations and upgrades to existing stormwater pits and services, which may be necessary to match new roadworks. e. connection of existing and new stormwater drainage systems to the new roadworks. Response Pursuant to Table SC6.7.2 of the Noosa Plan 2020, the ultimate reserve width for a laneway is 8m. Olivine Lane currently has a varied reserve width of between 6.7m and 8.7m. Council has taken a land dedication with any recent development applications approved on the southern side of Olivine Lane to achieve a consistent overall reserve width of 8.7m. This has included land dedication associated with developments over No’s 23, 31, 33, 35, 43-45 Tewantin Road (Refer to Figure 1 below).
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
Reserve Dedication
Consistent Reserve Alignment
Figure 1 – Land dedication along Olivine Lane
No land dedications have been required by Council associated with any development occurring on the
northern side of Olivine Lane. This includes a recent development for a dual occupancy located on the
adjoining site at 13 Olivine Street, Cooroy. Given the circumstances, it is unlikely that a consistent verge width
could be achieved on the northern side of Olivine Lane. It would also be unnecessary to require land
dedications on the northern side of Olivine Lane, given that a consistent dedication on the southern would
achieve the reserve width required by the planning scheme for a laneway. Overall, the development will
achieve the overall outcomes of the Cooroy Local Plan Code and not impact on the laneways ability to
provide vehicular access and serving functions.
Issue – Front Setback
Noting that the development proposes access from Olivine Lane and a 2 metre resumption from the laneway
frontage is required for widening Olivine Lane, (pursuant to PO17 of the Cooroy Local Plan Code), the existing
secondary dwelling will have a front setback of 1 metre from the Laneway.
Acceptable Outcome AO12.1 of the Medium Density Residential Zone Code requires buildings and structures
to be setback a minimum of 6 metres from frontages and as such, the development setback will be
substantially under the acceptable outcome.
Information Request
3. Provide amended plans with a building setback that complies with AO12.1 of the Medium Density
Residential Zone Code.
Page 3
Response
As identified in response to issue 1, a land dedication for reserve would not be necessary or warranted in this
circumstance. Consequently, the proposal would maintain an existing approved building alignment to
Olivine Lane.
Issue – Safety and Amenity
Acceptable Outcome AO5 of the Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code requires bedroom windows to
be at least 3 metres away from car parking areas. The proposed parking spaces are located less than 3
metres from the dwelling bedroom fronting Olivine Lane and does not comply with this acceptable outcome.
The performance outcome PO5 requires development to minimise noise carrying by locating noise sensitive
spaces away from noise generating areas of the development.
Information Request
4. Revise the application material to demonstrate how acoustic privacy is provided to the
dwelling fronting Olivine Lane.
Response
The dwelling fronting Olivine Lane is existing and was approved by Council at the current road boundary
setback. The building is a high-quality design and currently occupied by residents. The dwelling includes a
1.8m high fence and landscaping along the road boundary with Olive Lane, which adequately preserves the
amenity of the residents from traffic along the laneway.
Issue – Carparking
The proposed development fails to provide two covered carparks plus an additional carpark as outlined in
Table 9.4.1.4 of the Driveways and Parking Code.
Information Request
5. Provide amended plans that includes the provision for an additional covered carpark as required by
Table 9.4.1.4 of the Driveways and Parking Code. The additional covered carpark must meet the
requirements of AS2890.
Response
Please see attached amended plans which includes a covered parking space that meets the requirements
of AS2890.
Page 4
Proceeding This office trusts that the information supplied comprehensively addresses all of the issues relating to the information request. Should you have any further questions in relation to the proposal, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned on 0423 952 928 or via email at [email protected] sincerely, Marcus Brennan B. Urb. Reg. Plan.
Used in these records
Response to Information Request.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.1 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.