Response to Information Request · MCU23/0139

Response

As identified in response to issue 1, a land dedication for reserve would not be necessary or warranted in this
circumstance. Consequently, the proposal would maintain an existing approved building alignment to
Olivine Lane.


Issue – Safety and Amenity

Acceptable Outcome AO5 of the Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Code requires bedroom windows to
be at least 3 metres away from car parking areas. The proposed parking spaces are located less than 3
metres from the dwelling bedroom fronting Olivine Lane and does not comply with this acceptable outcome.

The performance outcome PO5 requires development to minimise noise carrying by locating noise sensitive
spaces away from noise generating areas of the development.

Information Request

4.     Revise the application material to demonstrate how acoustic privacy is provided to the
       dwelling fronting Olivine Lane.


Response

The dwelling fronting Olivine Lane is existing and was approved by Council at the current road boundary
setback. The building is a high-quality design and currently occupied by residents. The dwelling includes a
1.8m high fence and landscaping along the road boundary with Olive Lane, which adequately preserves the
amenity of the residents from traffic along the laneway.



Issue – Carparking

The proposed development fails to provide two covered carparks plus an additional carpark as outlined in
Table 9.4.1.4 of the Driveways and Parking Code.

Information Request

5.     Provide amended plans that includes the provision for an additional covered carpark as required by
       Table 9.4.1.4 of the Driveways and Parking Code. The additional covered carpark must meet the
       requirements of AS2890.


Response

Please see attached amended plans which includes a covered parking space that meets the requirements
of AS2890.