Council archive · source document
Attachment 5 - Geotechnical Assessment · MCU18/0015
RTI 11/055 Folio B427 EXPLANATION OF NOTES, ABBREVIATIONS & TERMS p Golder, USED ON BOREHOLE AND TEST PIT REPORTS DRILLING/EXCAVATION METHOD AS* Auger Screwing : RD Rotary blade or drag bit HQ Diamond Core - 63 mm AD* Auger Drilling RT Rotary Tricone bit NMLC Diamond Core - 52 mm “vv V-Bit RAB Rotary Air Blast NQ Diamond Core - 47 mm ‘T TC-Bit, e.g. ADT RC Reverse Circulation BH Tractor Mounted Backhoe HA Hand Auger PT Push Tube EX Tracked Hydraulic Excavator DTC _Diatube Coring CT Cable Tool Rig EE Existing Excavation WB Washbore or Bailer JET Jetting HAND Excavated by Hand Methods PENETRATION/EXCAVATION RESISTANCE L Low resistance. Rapid penetration possible with little effort from the equipment used. M Medium resistance. Excavation/possible at an acceptable rate with moderate effort from the equipment used. H High resistance to penetration/excavation. Further penetration is possible at a slow rate and requires significant effort from the equipment. R Refusal or Practical Refusal. No further progress possible without the risk of damage ‘or unacceptable wear to the digging implement or machine. These assessments are subjective and are dependent on many factors including the equipment power, weight, condition of excavation or drilling tools, and the experience of the operator. WATER ww Water level at date shown <j Partial water loss Cc Water inflow <~@» . Complete water loss GROUNDWATER NOT The observation of groundwater, whether present or not, was not possible due to drilling OBSERVED water, surface seepage or cave in of the borehole/test pit. GROUNDWATER NOT The borehole/test pit was dry soon after excavation. However, groundwater could be ENCOUNTERED present in less permeable strata. inflow may have been observed had the borehole/test pit been left open fora longer period, SAMPLING AND TESTING SPT Standard Penetration Test to AS1289.6.3.1-1993 4,7,11 N=18 4,7;11 = Blows per150mm. N = Blows per 300mm penetration following 150mm seating 30/80mm Where practical refusal occurs, the blows and penetration for that interval are reported RW Penetration occurred under the rod weight only © HW Penetration ocurred under the hammer and rod weight only HB Hammer double-bouncing on anvil OS Disturbed\sample BDS Bulk disturbed sample G Gas Sample Ww Waiter Sample FP Field permeability test over section noted FV Field vane shear test expressed as uncorrected shear strength s, PID Photoionisation Detector reading in ppm PM Pressuremeter test over section noted PP Pocket penetrometer test expressed as instrument reading in kPa U63 Thin walled tube sample - number indicates nominal sampte diameter in millimetres Ranking of Visually Observable Contamination and Odour (for specific soil contamination assessment projects) R=0 No visible evidence of contamination R=A No non-natural odours identified R=1 Slight evidence of visible contamination R=B Slight non-natural odours identified R=2 Visible contamination R=C Moderate non-natural odours identified R=3 Significant visible contamination R=D Strong non-natural odours identified ROCK CORE RECOVERY TCR = Total Core Recovery (%) SCR = Solid Core Recovery (%) RQD = Rock Quality Designation (%) _ Length of core recovered 100 > Length of cylindrical core recovered 100 _ > Axial fengths of core > 100 mm «100 Length of core run * Length of core run * 7 Length of core run GAP Form No. 6 RL3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Attachment 5 - Geotechnical Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.7 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.