Original source · versioned page text
8 Sdap 22
State code 22: Environmentally relevant activities
Guideline – SDAP State code 22: Environmentally Relevant Activities provides direction on how to address this code.
Table 22.1: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
All ERAs
PO1 Development is suitably located and designed to AO1.1 Development meets the acoustic quality Complies with AO1.1
avoid or mitigate environmental harm to the acoustic objectives for sensitive receptors identified in the
environment. Environmental Protection (Noise) Policy 2019. Noise is to be managed in accordance with
Noosaville Dredge Management Plan 2022.
PO2 Development is suitably located and designed to AO2.1 Development meets the air quality objectives of Complies with AO2.1
avoid or mitigate environmental harm to the air the Environmental Protection (Air) Policy 2019.
environment. Air quality is to be managed in accordance
with Noosaville Dredge Management Plan
2022.
PO3 Development (other than intensive animal No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO3
industry for poultry farming), is suitably located and
designed to avoid or mitigate environmental harm on Air quality (including odour) is to be managed
adjacent sensitive land uses caused by odour. in accordance with Noosaville Dredge
Management Plan 2022.
PO4 Development is suitably located and designed to AO4.1 Development meets the management intent, Complies with PO4
avoid or mitigate environmental harm to the receiving water quality guidelines and objectives of the
waters environment. Environmental Protection (Water and Wetland Water quality is to be managed in accordance
Biodiversity) Policy 2019. with Noosaville Dredge Management Plan
2022.
PO5 Development is designed to include elements No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO5
which:
1. prevent or minimise the production of hazardous Waste management is to be in accordance
contaminants and waste as by-products; or with Noosaville Dredge Management Plan
2022.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 22: Environmentally relevant activities Page 1 of 3
Document Set ID: 22350461
Version: 1, Version Date: 22/03/2023
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
2. contain and treat hazardous contaminants on-site
rather than releasing them into the environment;
and
3. provide secondary containment to prevent the
accidental release of hazardous contaminants to
the environment from spillage or leaks.
PO6 Environmentally hazardous materials located No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO6
on-site are stored to avoid or minimise their release into
the environment due to inundation during flood events. Hazardous materials management is to be
managed in accordance with Noosaville
Dredge Management Plan 2022.
All development – matters of state environmental significance
PO7 Development is designed and sited to: No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies with PO7
1. avoid impacts on matters of state environmental
significance; or The full extent proposed for this permit
2. minimise and mitigate impacts on matters of state application maintains the same minimum
environmental significance after demonstrating distance away from the Noosa Fish Habitat
avoidance is not reasonably possible; and Zone as the existing approved
3. provide an offset if, after demonstrating all dredging/nourishment zones (i.e. maintaining
reasonable avoidance, minimisation and mitigation 25m distance). The additional locations are
measures are undertaken, the development results not considered to have increased impact on
in an acceptable significant residual impact on a Matters of State Environmental Significance.
matter of state environmental significance.
Statutory note: For Brisbane core port land, an offset may only be
applied to development on land identified as E1 Conservation/Buffer,
E2 Open Space or Buffer/Investigation in the Brisbane Port LUP
precinct plan.
Intensive animal industry – poultry farming (ERA 4(2))
PO8 Poultry farming development (where farming AO8.1 For poultry farming involving 300,000 birds or
Not Applicable
more than 200,000 birds) is suitably located and less, development meets the separation distances as
designed to avoid or mitigate environmental harm on determined using the S-factor methodology to: The works are not poultry farming.
adjacent sensitive land uses, caused by odour. 1. a sensitive land use in a rural zone; and
2. boundary of a non-rural zone.
OR
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 22: Environmentally relevant activities Page 2 of 3
Document Set ID: 22350461
Version: 1, Version Date: 22/03/2023
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO8.2 Development meets the separation distances as
determined by odour modelling using the following
criteria:
1. 2.5 odour units, 99.5 percent, 1 hour average for a
sensitive land use in a rural zone; or
2. 1.0 odour units, 99.5 percent, 1 hour average for
the boundary of a non-rural zone.
State Development Assessment Provisions v3.0
State code 22: Environmentally relevant activities Page 3 of 3
Document Set ID: 22350461
Version: 1, Version Date: 22/03/2023