Council archive · source document
Attachment 3B - Process Design Strategy - OREZ · 132005.638.06
PR25001 Noosa Composting Facility
Process Design Strategy
1. Option 1 – Second screening step downstream of the drum screen, splitting the
oversize into a graded mulch product and a coarse fraction disposed of or returned
to the process as bulking agent when space is available within a tunnel and
depended on seasonal fluctuations. This adds a screening step, a further conveyor
and an additional storage bay / using one of the existing ones.
2. Option 2 – Secondary screening of the oversize on a campaign basis using mobile
plant, avoiding fixed capital but adding operating cost and plant hire, and requiring
additional hardstand for the campaign.
3. Option 3 – Secondary screening on a campaign basis using NSC-owned mobile
plant, avoiding both fixed capital and plant hire, subject to NSC holding suitable
screening plant with available capacity, and still requiring additional hardstand for
the campaign.
Recovering a graded mulch product from the oversize fraction reduces the tonnage leaving
site as low to no value material. Progressing any option requires a market view of what
graded mulch achieves per tonne in the Noosa catchment against the current oversize
disposition. The achievable product specification and price for each grade, should be
developed by NRC to enable assessment.
9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Attachment 3B - Process Design Strategy - OREZ.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 215 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.