DUPLICATE PM Submission Object - Peregian Beach Community Association - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

                     20


                     The developer does not dispute the DA’s lack of compliance with the
                     Noosa Plan.

                     In the DA prepared by Adams & Sparkes the following comments appear:

                     Adams + Sparkes page 38 para 136

                               5.5.1 Eastern Beached Locality Code 5.5.1.1 Inconsistent Land
                               Use – Specific Outcome O73 136. The proposed development does
                               not comply with Specific Outcome O74 of the code, with the
                               proposed Visitor Accommodation (Type 4) and Multiple Housing
                               (Type 4) not being a consistent land uses within the Open Space
                               Recreational Zone. (Highlighting added)

                     Adams + Sparkes page 41 para 145 states:

                               5.5.1.2 Building Height – Probable Solution S4.1
                               “145. The proposed development generally complies with the preferred
                               maximum building height of 8 metres specified within with code, with all
                               detached units containing a maximum building height not exceeding 7
                               metres in height, when considered from the finished ground level.
                               When considered from the Natural Ground Level, there are a number
                               of roof forms associated with the detached Multiple Housing Units
                               that exceed the 8 metre height limit, …(Highlighting added)

                     Adams + Sparkes page 42 para 151 states:

                               5.5.1.3 Setbacks – Probable Solution S5.1
                               151. The proposed development does not comply with Specific
                               Outcome S5.1 of the Eastern Beaches Locality Code, as the
                               proposed development does not comply with Council’s preferred
                               setbacks for development within the Open Space Recreation
                               Zone, where adjoining land within a residential zone. (Highlighting
                               added)

                     Adams + Sparkes page 43 para 155 states:

                               5.5.1.4 Site Cover, Gross Floor Area and Plot Ratio – Specific Outcome
                               O6, O7 and O9
                               155. It is noted that there is no site cover, gross floor area or plot ratio
                               limitations for development within the Open Space Recreational Zone.
                               Despite this, the proposed development does not result in an
                               overdevelopment of the site, with the proposed development resulting
                               in a total site cover of 5,463m2 (39%), total GFA of 9,232m2 and
                               2,663m2 (24%) of the site as planting area. It is noted that these
                               calculations have been made based on the overall site area once the
                               required land dedication included in the Court Order approval (Appeal
                               2587 of 2008) and the Shopping Centre approval (MCU13/0251) has
                               being excluded.




Document Set ID: 20308026
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017