Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix 3 - Code Table Assessment

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0034 Development Application - Cover letter, Forms, Proposal plans & Planning Reports.

of 17

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

        Specific Outcome               Probable Solution                  Compliance
a) contribute positively to the roof of the building has a roof does not involve a building.
   local skyline;                pitch no less than 5 degrees and
b) complement the low rise has minimum 600mm eaves to
                                 at least 75% of the perimeter of
   character of the locality;
                                 the building;
c) use simple traditional roof AND
   designs, such as hipped, S14.2 Buildings and structures
   gabled and skillion; and      do not include rooftop terraces.
d) do not create opportunities
   for residents to overlook the
   private open space areas of
   neighbouring properties.


8.11 Environment, Conservation and Recreation
Environment         and    cultural No solution provided          O15 - Complies.
heritage values                                                   The proposed development will
O15 There are no significant                                      have      minor     impact     on
adverse effects on biodiversity,                                  environmental and cultural
native vegetation, native fauna                                   heritage values of the site.
habitat, landscape quality, water                                 The proposed facility is located
quality or cultural heritage                                      on private property which is
values, including those related                                   heavily vegetated in parts,
to—                                                               containing areas of mature
a) changes to natural drainage;                                   vegetation.     The      proposed
b) disturbance of the remnant                                     facility has intentionally been
     vegetation      or    wetland                                located         outside        of
                                                                  environmentally sensitive areas
     systems;
                                                                  (e.g. Regrowth and Remnant
c) management of landslide                                        Vegetation areas) and will not
     and fire risk;                                               require     removal      of   any
d) erosion and the transport of                                   vegetation.
     sediments off site;                                          The proposed facility will be
e) unmanaged public access;                                       located away from wetland
f) effluent disposal;                                             systems and will be unlikely to
                                                                  impact on the natural drainage
g) changes to fauna habitat and
                                                                  or cause erosion of the land.
     behaviour; and                                               Furthermore, the facility will
h) disturbance of buildings and                                   not cause sediment run-off,
     features, including natural                                  impact on effluent disposal or
     features of cultural heritage                                increase the risk of fire.
     significance.                                                There is no significant cultural
                                                                  heritage values present on the
                                                                  subject site.
                                                                  Therefore the proposal is
                                                                  consistent with O15.




Open space network           S16.1 Open space corridors and O16 - Not applicable.
O16 An integrated open space existing native vegetation in The subject site is located


NBN-4BBZ-4GYM-5132-Schreibers                                                        Page 63
Log in to download the original file

Appendix 3 - Code Table Assessment.pdf · 291 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.