Original source · versioned page text
RFI - 8. Letter - Junction Association
1.3 on land which is unable to be readily amalgamated with adjoining land.
2. It is not practical or desirable from a town planning perspective to provide more than 6 car parks
onsite due to the nature and type of the developments on adjoining land.
3. It is in the community’s interest to provide for alternative car parking arrangements because of
traffic and/or pedestrian safety concerns caused by the development.
4. The provision of more than 6 onsite car parks and their access is not practical or desirable being
within a central area and where additional footpath crossovers would adversely impact upon the
streetscape and/or create safety issues.
5. The locality would benefit more from improved public transport, pedestrian or cycle facilities
rather than the provision of additional car parking onsite.
We’re informed Council staff have advised the owner’s representatives that, in this instance, Council may
decline to use the Policy because it does not currently have any projects on which to spend the money.
The Policy specifies contributions paid under it:
1. will be expended in the locality of the development; and
2. may be used for, but are not necessarily limited to, any of the following:
2.1 provision of car parking within a road reserve or on land for which the Council is trustee;
2.2 alteration and rationalisation of existing public car parking to improve efficiency and
utilisation;
2.3 improvements to the configuration of existing infrastructure and facilities to improve
traffic, pedestrian and cycle capacity or safety;
2.4 construction of additional pedestrian and cycle facilities in a locality to encourage
transport means that are an alternative to private cars; and
2.5 construction of public transport infrastructure to improve efficiency and encourage the
use of public transport.
We see no reason why the owner’s contribution could not simply be put to one side for use with projects
within this precinct which meet the above criteria such as the Noosa Junction streetscape, including its
Master Plan, Noosa Drive pathway, etc.
The efforts of our Committee have seen Noosa Junction grow into a vibrant retail and hospitality precinct
with increasing popularity for locals and visitors. For it to continue to do so and remain competitive with
other commercial precincts, Noosa Junction landowners must be encouraged to develop their sites rather
than be confronted with ever changing obstacles to their proposals.
We strongly support the owner’s request that the Policy be applied to its development application and
that Council enter into an Infrastructure Agreement with the owner whereunder it pays Council the
requisite contribution in lieu of providing onsite more than the intended 6 car parks.
We await your reply and invite you to telephone or email me if you have any questions.
Yours faithfully
Chris Brinkley
President and Secretary
0418 708 866 | [email protected]
cc: Ms N Gorton – [email protected]
Mr P Murphy – [email protected]
Ms K Rawlings – [email protected]
Mr S Walsh – [email protected]
Mr M Walsh – [email protected]
Noosa Junction Association Inc Page 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.