Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Council archive · source document

PM Submission Object - Graham Backway - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

6) Substantially Increased Traffic & Congestion is assured during construction as standing
traffic queues currently form at all accesses to the roundabout, particularly at daily peak
times, exacerbated further during school & public holidays. The proposed development risks
being a serious source of additional congestion & given the layout/landform, nigh on
impossible to mitigate in the future.

7)Diminished vistas across the National Park to Mt Cooroy due to bulky Hotel/Motel
building’s projected heights. Council needs to ensure height specifications are accurate &
the current expansive views are maintained. Here’s an opportunity to protect & showcase
the intent of Noosa’s logo ‘Different by nature!’

8)Other concerns include density of buildings & infrastructure within the precinct, the
provision of scarce green space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to sunlight &
natural breezes, the provision of public access pathway between two story buildings, with
little to recommend passive surveillance or a non threatening environment, particularly at
night.

9) So many missed opportunities to work with community in consultation with Noosa
Council’s Master Plan for Rufous St & the adjoining laneway to add to the amenity. The
north western corner’s existing vegetation could have seen the creation of green
space/parkland to embellish the precinct for visitors & local community with potential to
make connections between Rufous St /laneway with this development instead it separates
itself from the village feel.

10)This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside & those who
choose this relaxed pedestrian location, where thongs, even bare feet are the norm. It
delivers instead, undesirable urban density & city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with
Peregian’s much sought after relaxed village character & community engagement.

\/we urge Noosa Council to protect the village of Peregian Beach & to refuse this DA.

Full name (Note that each person should send in their own submission — not several people per

submission) GkAW AM Backuny

Address ag Gawler iSfe
PreiGinnl bert BLD 4873

Signature unless this is lodged via email of

aye 2@ belwail - com
PLEA HECK E ‘HOW TO FILEA SUBMISSION’ FORM TO ENSURE YOUR SUBMISSION IS ELIGIBLE
FOR CONSIDERATION

2429 128 a

 

Used in these records

About this file

File size
517 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PM Submission Object - Graham Backway - MCU16_0153 & REC16_0041.pdf · 517 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.