Council archive · source document
MCU22.0174-Applicant's Response to Council's IR · MCU22/0174
Figure 2: Edward Street/East Elevation (Attachment 1, Plan No. DD4.1 B)
The entry pathways to Units 1 and 2 have been reduced in width by 0.190 metres, and 0.210 metres
respectively. This reduction allows for deeper landscaping to occur along the northern and southern
boundaries, including the planting of trees which will screen these sections of the proposed duplex from the
adjoining properties.
Unit 2’s intrusion into the setback is for approx. 3.5m in length which is in alignment with the neighbouring
properties clothes line area, which does not impact on amenity. Unit 1’s intrusion is for approximately 9m which
is in alignment with the adjoining areas open space area. Due to the intensive landscaping proposed od
Syzigiums, the minor intrusion will not be visible.
Figure 3: South-East Perspective (Attachment 1, Plan No. DD8.2 B)
Council’s Issue - Height of Fence and Retaining Wall
The side and rear boundary fence is proposed to be located on top of the retaining wall, having a
combined height of 2.8 metres due to the filling of the site. This creates amenity issues for neighbouring
property. The positioning of the fill should taper down to boundaries where possible.
Information Required by Council
5. Provide amended plans that consider the amenity of adjoining property and amend fill areas and
fence heights accordingly.
Applicant’s Response
As denoted on the Contour Survey Plan prepared by Noosa Cooloola Land Surveys and within the
PO Box 1818 07 5474 3873
Noosa Heads [email protected]
QLD 4567 rgstrategic.com.au
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU22.0174-Applicant's Response to Council's IR.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 829 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.