2506-46370 SRA Response with conditions · OPW25/0012

                                                                                          2506-46370 SRA




Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)

The reasons for the SARA’s decision are:
 SARA assessed the development against the following code of the SDAP, version 3.2:
       o State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas (State code 25).

      With conditions, the development complies with the assessment benchmarks of State code 25 of the
       SDAP in that the development:
           o does not cause an unacceptable impact on mapped koala habitat areas;
           o is designed and located to avoid impacts or, where the matters of state environmental
              significance cannot be reasonably avoided, impacts are reasonably minimised and mitigated;
           o results in a significant residual impact that is acceptable, and an offset is provided.

Material used in the assessment of the application:
 the development application material and submitted plans
 Planning Act 2016
 Planning Regulation 2017
 the SDAP (version 3.2), as published by SARA
 the Development Assessment Rules
 SARA DA Mapping system
 section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019



Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response
provisions
(page left intentionally blank)




    State Assessment and Referral Agency                                                     Page 6 of 7