Original source · versioned page text
PM Submission Object - John Hutcheon MCU16/0153 & REC16/004
From: Robyn Hewitt
Sent: 21 Apr 2017 14:07:47 +1000
To: Mailbox Council Mail
Subject: Submission opposing DA : MCU 16/153 REC16 / 004
Attachments: DEFEND-THE-INTEGRITY-OF-THE-NOOSA-PLAN-submission John.docx
We demand that Council defends the town plan and refuses this application
Regards
John Hutcheon
Document Set ID: 20306680
Version: 1, Version Date: 21/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
Notice of Submission under the
Sustainable Planning Act 2009
1. Application details
File No: MCU 16/153 REC16 / 0041
Postal address of Land (as advertised): 215 DAVID LOW WAY, PEREGIAN BEACH
Nature of Proposed Development: MULTIPLE HOUSING –TYPE 4 CONVECTIONAL, VISITOR
ACCOMODATION
2. Submitter details
Full name of Submitter: John Hutcheon
Email Address: [email protected]
Postal address: Po Box 269
Suburb: Peregian Beach
State: QLD
Postcode: 4573
I, make the following submission:
For the attention of:
Mr Patrick Murphy,
The Assessment Officer,
Noosa Shire Council
[email protected]
Dear Mr Murphy,
Submission in opposition to the Development Application
MCU 16/0153 & REC16/0041
EFFECTIVE PLANNING POINTS THAT DEFEND THE INTREGRITY OF THE NOOSA PLAN
I strongly object to the inclusion of the housing estate in this proposal, but in particular, the lack
of visitor accommodation being provided as required by the Noosa Plan.
The proposed development significantly conflicts with the Noosa Plan for the following reasons:
The proposed development being located within the Open Space Recreation Zone does
not contribute to the desired lifestyle of residents because it does not offer a variety of
passive and active recreational experiences that are conducive to community interaction
and wellbeing;
The proposed development seeks to provide a small lot housing development and, in
particular, Multiple Housing Type 4 – Conventional which is not a consistent use in the
Open Space Recreation Zone;
The proposed development seeks to provide Visitor Accommodation Type 4, but not in
association with Visitor Accommodation Type 2, and therefore is not consistent with the
Open Space Recreation Zone;
The proposed application appears to reflect an incorrect site cover percentage where
some structures have not been included in the calculation. An example of this is the stair
and entry for the Reed Beach Houses (refer pages SD12 and SD23). This is a clear omission
and indicates that either the developer is seeking to misrepresent the proposed site cover
or they have been inaccurate in their calculations by error. In either case the Noosa
Council has an absolute duty to reject the application until all inaccuracies have been
identified and included in the Council’s deliberations on whether this DA should be
accepted.
Document Set ID: 20306680
Version: 1, Version Date: 21/04/2017
Page 3
The proposed development does not protect the Peregian Beach caravan park site for low
cost visitor accommodation;
Visitor Accommodation Type 4 is being proposed on the land, but is not integrated as part
of a caravan park use or other form of budget accommodation;
The proposed buildings and structures are not designed and sited to be attractive,
comfortable and accessible to the public or provide suitable landscape treatments and
amenities, conducive to community interaction and convenience and public safety;
The proposed development is not consistent with the reasonable expectations of
residents in the locality, given the Peregian Beach Caravan site is to primarily provide for
budget visitor accommodation, which is in the public interest;
The Proposed development does not in any way conform to the written advice, cited
below, from the Council to the developer prior to the pre-lodgment meeting held on 14
December 2016 (between Council and the developer):
The Open Space Recreation zone in Peregian Beach specifically seeks to protect and retain
the site for low cost visitor accommodation needs reflective of the site’s previous use as a
caravan park, but also acknowledges that a range of visitor accommodation may be
provided where integrated with budget accommodation. There is no support given to
permanent residents on the site.
It is noted that the current approval included only visitor accommodation, with no
permanent resident accommodation proposed. This approved development was supported
by Council through an appeal process as it was acknowledged that it included low to mid
cost visitor accommodation being a reasonable alternative to the Planning Scheme’s
intent to retain the caravan park.
It is considered the current proposal does not meet the Planning Scheme’s intent for the
site as there is a lack of and a limited range of visitor accommodation proposed…….
The Noosa Council has correctly performed, as reflected in the cited correspondence
above, its role as custodian of what was formerly publicly (ratepayer) owned land by
informing the developer that the DA proposal does not comply with the requirements
requested by the Council in regard to provision of low cost, non-permanent
accommodation. For Noosa Council to now allow the development application would be a
failure of its duty to the Noosa ratepayers.
There are no grounds provided that are sufficient to overcome the level of conflict
identified with the Noosa Plan.
The proposed development application should be refused for the above reasons.
John Hutcheon
13/1 Lowry St
Peregian Beach 4573
Document Set ID: 20306680
Version: 1, Version Date: 21/04/2017