Original source · versioned page text
2020-08-20 Ordinary Meeting Minutes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING MINUTES 20 AUGUST 2020
Strategic Framework and 3.1.3 k) of the Desired Environmental Outcomes;
and
b) the proposed lagoon/wave pool is at odds with the natural setting, is not low
key and does not facilitate education and interpretation of the natural
environment, and instead relies on built infrastructure as the tourist attraction
contrary to 1.7.8 d) of the Strategic Plan and 3.1.3 k) of the Desired
Environmental Outcomes.
4. The proposal does not comply with the Overall Outcomes a), e), g), h), r), s), u),
and oo) and Specific Outcomes O1 and O9 of the Noosa North Shore Locality
Code, as the proposal:
a) is not directly related to recreational experiences offered in the locality, which
are based around the area’s natural environment;
b) is not consistent with maintaining the locality’s remote setting and
undeveloped character being an area largely dedicated to conservation;
c) is likely to adversely impact on the amenity of visitors and residents on the
Noosa North Shore;
d) is not secondary to its open space setting with a very low intensity and scale
of operation;
e) will undermine the ability of the North Shore to offer visitor accommodation;
f) is likely to require a large number of water tankers to initially fill and continue
to top up the wave pool which will impact on other ferry users and residents
along the road access; and
g) would result in significant adverse impacts on biodiversity, native vegetation,
native fauna habitat, landscape quality, and ground water quality as a result
of clearing, excavation and waste water disposal.
5. The proposal does not comply with the Overall Outcomes a) and c) and Specific
Outcomes O3, and O35 of the Visitor Accommodation Code, as the proposal:
a) is not of a scale and nature complementary and respectful to its
surroundings, has not been designed to integrate with the natural landscape
setting and will result in adverse environmental impacts;
b) is not compatible with and does not promote the natural environment.
6. The proposal does not comply with the Overall Outcomes a), b) c), d) and g) and
Specific Outcomes O1, O3, O4, O7, O8, O11, O14, O15, O16, O18 and O19 of the
Biodiversity Overlay Code, as the proposal would result in significant adverse
impacts on the natural environment as a result of:
a) clearing of threatened species habitat of high value regrowth vegetation;
b) the potential to pollute a wetland with high ecological values through waste
water disposal.
7. The development proposal is inconsistent with the 2020 Noosa Plan, in which the
land is zoned tourist accommodation, the provisions of which seek to restrict the
subject land for visitor accommodation and to preserve the amenity of the area and
natural vegetation in a similar manner to the 2006 Noosa Plan.
8. Since the time of lodgement of the development application the State mapping has
been updated, the subject land being now mapped as a koala priority area and
core koala habitat area in which development is prohibited under the Planning
Regulation 2017 to the extent it interferes with koala habitat.
Page 8 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.