HOA Consent · 132007.2399.02

1 Tiled roof – a minimum of 65% of the whole roof is to be led, not just the top level. The flat area shown in the
original applica on as landscaped roof is considered a roof. At present, only around 23% of the roof is shown as led.

2 Swimming pool ‐ The Body Corporate Commi ee has consistently determined that the water in a swimming pool be a
minimum of 900mm from boundary where the pool abu s the golf course. This requirement remains in place.

3 Ground level – The proposed plan shows an increase in ground level within 1500mm of the boundary for
approximately 70% of the western boundary and 100% of the north‐western boundary. This is not permi ed. The
specifica ons of the exis ng walls do not allow for increased retaining.

4 Driveway realignment – The proposed driveway occupies common property. Considera on would be given to a
comparable swap. That is, if x square metres of common property is required, then x square metres of Lot 17 be
provided for common property garden.

I wish to emphasise that all residents have faced the same restric ons from covenants and by‐laws when designing their
dwellings. In many instances, people may have preferred something different but were required to comply with the
wishes of the developer (and subsequently, under delegated authority, the body corporate commi ee).

Could you please resubmit your applica on, taking into account the above‐men oned points.
The commi ee is happy to answer any ques ons you may have.

Regards, Keith Calvert
Chairman – The Oasis Body Corporate Committee

Phone: 0412 542 859




                                                           5