Council archive · source document
130830 - Notice of Submission · MCU13/0092
Attached to the e-mail Properly made submission (object) Belinda Moharich MCU13/0092.
Traffic and Accessibility From my reading of the plans, it appears that there is neither pedestrian nor vehicular access to David Low Way directly from the site. This means that access must be provided via Woodland Drive and Rufous Street. This is not acceptable in terms of safety and amenity. Rufous Street is the sole access to the Peregian Beach Community Kindergarten, as well as the Di Hurst Oval, both of which are accessed by young children walking with their parents (in the case of the kindergarten), and often on their own in relation to Di Hurst Oval. It appears to me to be a conflict to have high volumes of commercial vehicular traffic (both customers and service vehicles) competing with pedestrian traffic. In addition, service vehicles taking away rubbish, removing grease trap waste, and bringing in stock usually occur outside busy trading hours, often in the early morning. This is not consistent with the surrounding residential area and has the capacity to adversely affect the amenity of those living close by. Inconsistency with the Plan The land is not zoned for a commercial use. The surrounding uses include a major active recreation space (Di Hurst Oval), a Community Hall, Telstra Sub-Station, Community Kindergarten and Tennis Club – that is, institutional and public uses. While I understand that there is discretion to consider any use in any zone, the fact of the existing zoning, and the uses to which the surrounding land is put suggests that this use in this location is not consistent. Design - Security and Passive Surveillance In terms of the design of the proposed Shopping Centre, I note that the service areas are located adjacent to Rufous Street and backing on to Di Hurst Oval. Di Hurst Oval already suffers from a lack of passive surveillance and this proposal serves to entrench this position by the construction of blank walls along this facade. This is unacceptable from an urban design perspective and will impact on the perceived safety of ad hoc use of this recreation space. Conclusion For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully request that the Council consider refusing the application. (if necessary, use separate sheet of paper and attach) To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that: 1. It is in writing and is signed by each person who made the submission; and 2. Is received on or before the last day; and 3. States the name and address of each person; and 4. States the grounds of the submission and the facts and circumstances relied on in support of the grounds Please note that all submissions, including individual submitter’s particulars, are published on Council’s website (PD Online) and therefore will be accessible to internet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not they are properly made. 2 of 2 2013/14 Regional Strategy and Planning Notice of Submission V1 XX/XX/XX
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
130830 - Notice of Submission.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 165 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.