Town Planning Report_(2)

           Internal manoeuvring
           Private open space
           Provision of housing options including small dwellings
           Households for range of income earners and residents with reduced mobility
           Provides a positive contribution to the streetscape by providing a quality-built form and
            integrated landscaping
           Building height
           Building setbacks

  In particular, it is identified that the development actually exceeds the minimum landscaping and
  site cover requirements required by the planning scheme. For example, the development provides
  42.4% of the site as landscaping as opposed to minimum requirement of 40%. Similarly, the
  development only applies a site cover of 44% as opposed the allowable 45% of the site (pertaining to
  small dwellings).

  In light of the above, the minor non-compliance in terms of plot ratio is negligible in terms of the
  overall design and built form outcomes sought by the code. Furthermore, it is considered that the
  proposal’s compliance with site cover, landscaping and (generally) setback requirements support the
  view that the proposed plot ratio does not represent overdevelopment of the medium density
  residential site.

  5.3.3     Front setback

  A012.1 states:
  Building and structure meet the following minimum boundary setbacks
      a) For frontage 6m
      b) …




  Figure 9 – Front setback




TOWN PLANNING REPORT – Revision A                    101 & 105 Eumundi Noosa Rd Noosaville               Page 20