Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

20200903OBA_R1_Loading_Dock_Operational_Conditions · OPW20/0145

of 31

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

 

Glazing 2.1m x 1.5m

 

 

Glazing 3.0m x 0.5m Glazing 3.0m x 0.5m

DD

Balcony Balcony

 

   

     

    

Bedroom

   

Bedroom

 

Glazing 3.0m x 1.2m
Glazing 3.0m x 1.2m

Living Room Living Room

Unit 1 Unit 2

 

 

 

eee= Facade Wall
== = internal Partition Wall
Figure 3- Assumed Typical Unit Layout

Figure 4 to Figure 6 present the SoundPLAN™ model of the day time period emissions for all loading docks
and the compactor operating concurrently. To assess compliance against the Laz,aqj1nr Noise criteria for the
worst-case conditions, the model presents the Lmax dB(A) noise levels. The model includes the existing 1.0m
high wall in the loading area, as well as the proposed 1.8m high acoustic barrier along the boundary of the
sensitive receivers (lots 19, and 21 as indicated in Section 6).

I\Mobs\2019\20191414\20191414.2\202009030BA_R4_Noise_Impact_Assessment.docx 13

Used in these records

About this file

File size
5.9 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

20200903OBA_R1_Loading_Dock_Operational_Conditions.pdf · 5.9 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.