Council archive · source document
Request for Further Information - 010.2007.00001259.001 [As Published] · 132007.1259
6. A written list of planning grounds supporting the proposed uses on the site, which
are identified as inconsistent by The Noosa Plan (ie Entertainment & Dining &
Business and Visitor Accommodation Type being without any caravan park sites).
7. A written description of how proposed buildings A, B & C conform or otherwise
with The Noosa Plan’s definition of visitor hostel.
8. A written list of planning grounds supporting the proposed development’s design
in terms of proposed population density, gross floor area, building height,
setbacks from David Low Way and landscaping. In this regard, please note that:
8.1. the population density for visitor hostel is based on the areas of the site
being used for visitor accommodation and not commercial as currently
calculated. A breakdown should be provided as to how the proposed
population has been calculated (ie bed numbers per room etc).
8.2. the maximum building height for the site is 8 metres, 2 storeys, not 11
metres as stated in the planning report for the Open Space Recreation
Zone (ie 11 metres is only for an indoor sporting complex).
8.3. the building setbacks to David Low Way are to maintain the visual
continuity and pattern of the street and allow landscaping between the
buildings. Notably, development along this section of David Low Way
including the hotel is setback 6 metres from the front boundary.
8.4. the landscape setbacks to David Low Way (average 2m soft landscaping)
and landscape areas (10%) around the commercial component are not
considered to be offset by the rear of the site being not developed.
Artists Sketch
9. An artist’s sketch of the proposed development from a more southerly
perspective along David Low Way.
Ecological Assessment
10. In regards to the Ecological Assessment:
10.1. A site survey of vegetation types, overlaid with those areas to remain
undeveloped/buffer areas and proposed to be developed.
10.2. An assessment of the quality of vegetation of RE 12.2.7 which is not
proposed to be retained.
10.3. A site survey identifying any significant species within the area to be
developed.
10.4. Confirmation that the vegetated areas proposed to be retained is identified
(ie pegged) on site.
11. A site survey of existing trees within the proposed development area identifying
the tree type and whether it is proposed to be retained/removed.
Fire Management
Award Winner - Australian Clean Beach
Challenge 2004 Litter Prevention
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Request for Further Information - 010.2007.00001259.001 [As Published]Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 25 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.