Council archive · source document
Request to Extend Relevant Period - 152006.1999.01
Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
=_
-- ...
. :. ..
U.'ANe 0 N S U l TAN T S
The final approval granted by way of the Planning and Environment Court Order (Appeal No. 344 of 2009) dated 5
July, 2013 reduced the overall yield to 52 Lots and Park. Significantly, the approval requires dedication of 52.757
hectares of parkland.
The site is now zoned as Rural under the Noosa Plan 2006. Despite the change to the zoning under the current
planning scheme, the development layout and design is considered to be consistent with current design State and
Council requirements for development on land subject to enviranmental constraints.
In this respect It is noted that the approved development:
o Is predominantly located in disturbed areas of the site.
o Incorporates setbacks for bushfire management.
o Layout and design of allotments has been generally designed around already cleared vegetation areas and
environmental constraints;
o The conditions placed on the development appropriately address all relevant environmental concerns;
o Existing development rights are considered to exist under the original rezoning development permit;
o Results in dedication of significant open space which will result in considerable community benefits
through the long-term conservation of areas with ecological values.
o The site adjoins the urban fringe of Noosaville, is the next in sequence and Is surrounded by urban and
rural residential development to the north and west of the site which is compatible and similar in nature.
Our assessment against the statutory decision making criteria in section 388 of the SPA is provided below:
The consistency of the approval, including its conditions, with the current lows and
policies applying to the development, including, for example, the amount and type 0
infrastructure contributions, or charges payable under chapter 8, parts 2 and 3 (s. 388
(a) SPA)
Response
The approval was assessed and approved under the Superseded Planning Scheme 1985 Schedule and
1997 Strategic Plan far Naasa. It is considered that the development approval is generally consistent with
current laws and policies applying to the development.
The current approval conditions are consistent with current laws and policies in the following respects:-
o The engineering conditions which have been placed on the existing development approval are
considered to be consistent with current engineering design requirements and standards.
Reference is made to Civil Engineering conditions 18 to 37 and conditions 68 to 78. It is noted
that the subsequent operational works application will be assessed in accordance with local laws
and policies applicable at the time of lodgement.
JFP Ref: Ml775 Page 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Request to Extend Relevant Period - 152006.1999.01Related documentApplication case desk ↗
Request to Extend Relevant Period - 152006.1999.01Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.