Council archive · source document
Request to Extend Relevant Period - 152006.1999.01
Very large file (10.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
=ma
- :!III!
a•••• co N SU L T ANTS
li
•
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Comments
dedicotion will also be protected
through the implementation of
vegetation covenants. It is noted
that stormwater management will
require to be implemented to
ensure appropriate water quality
measures are implemented.
Open space network
098 Land within the Rural Zone forms No solution provided 098 - Complies. The open space
part of an open space network between network within the locality will be
Lake Weyba and the Tewantin State further enhanced through significant
Forest and sub-<:oastalescarpment. dedication of 52.757 hectares of
parkland.
The community's current awareness of the development approval (s388 (b) SPA)
Response
There is reasonable level of community awareness that the site will be developed for rural residential land
use purposes. Despite this development proposal originally being a code assessable application, it is
considered that the community would be reasonably aware of the proposed deveiopment, with respect
to:-
• The development approval (Planning and Environment Court Judgement 344 of 2009 dated 5"'
July, 2013) is publicly available on Council's PD Online system;
• The land adjoins similar land use and is the next in sequence to adjacent and surrounding urban
and rural residential development;
• Out of the 17 direct adjoining landowners, 13 owners have retained ownership for the entire
period since the original development application was lodged;
• The remaining 4 purchasers which acquired adjoining premises after the development was
approved, could have easily obtain information from Council regarding possible developments
and approvals on neighbouring properties as part of their due diligence.
whether, if the request were refused-
(i) further rights to make a submission may be available for a further development
application; and
(ii) the likely extent to which those rights may be exercised (5385 (c)SPA)
Response
The application if it were remade would be subject to a higher level of assessment requiring impact
assessment as the site is now zoned as Rural under the current Noosa Plan 2006. Therefore, if this request
was refused, further rights to make a submission would be available if a fresh development application
was lodged. However, this does not preclude an extension being granted.
JFP Ref: MI77S Page 11
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Request to Extend Relevant Period - 152006.1999.01Related documentApplication case desk ↗
Request to Extend Relevant Period - 152006.1999.01Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.1 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.