Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

RFI - civil response letter

of 3

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Our Ref: S22-018                                                                                                      Westera Partners Pty Ltd
                                                                                                                        Sunshine Coast Office
                                                                                                                                   P 0437 335 403
19 May 2022

Noosa Council
PO Box 141
Tewantin QLD 4565

Attention:                    Patrick Murphy

Council Ref:                  MCU22/0049 & OPW22/0090


RE: RESPONSE TO COUNCIL’S REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE APPLICATION
LODGED FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT 168 EDWARDS STREET, SUNSHINE BEACH
Requested Information:
Issue
Council has concerns about the design of the proposed driveway. The width of the driveway at the existing
road exceeds the maximum width for a duplex with a frontage less than 20 metres.
Information Required
1. Provided an amended driveway design that has been designed generally in accordance with RS-049
     and RS-050 or alternatively demonstrate the need for the wider driveway. The amended design is to
     be certified by a suitably qualified persons (RPEQ – Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland)

Response
The proposed driveway is considered to be generally compliant with RS-049 for a duplex with frontage
less than 20m. The width at the boundary is 5.0m and the width at edge of asphalt is 6.20m which only
represents an additional 100mm of flare on each side of the crossover to assist with the non-standard
narrow verge width.
Requested Information:
Issue
There is an insufficient amount of spot levels and grades along the northern side of the driveway for Council
to make an assessment. Council has concerns about the risk of pooling and direction of water along the
proposed driveway.
Information Required
2. Provide additional detail on the access driveway. The detail must be prepared by a suitability qualified
     persons and include, but not be limited to:
    2.1. levels and grades of the access driveway;
    2.2. demonstrate that a B99 vehicle will not bottom out or scrape while entering/exiting the driveway;
          and


 SUNSHINE COAST                            B RIS BA NE                          GOLD COAST                              NORTHE RN NSW
 Suite 2, Norval Corporate Centre          Level 2, 33 Langland Street          Level 3, 17 Welch Street                Suite 24 Level 2
 13 Norval Court                           Newstead QLD 4006                    Southport QLD 4215                      11-13 Pearl Street
                                                                                                                        Kingscliff NSW 2487
 Maroochydore QLD 4558

 P: 07 5391 3777 F: 07 5646 5857           P: 07 3852 4333 F : 07 5646 5857     P: 07 5571 1599 F : 07 5646 5857        P: 02 6674 8047 F: 07 5646 5857

 PO Box 2016                               PO Box 2016                          PO Box 6138                             PO Box 1131
 Fortitude Valley BC, QLD 4006             Fortitude Valley BC, QLD 4006        Southport Mail Centre 9726              Kingscliff NSW 2487

 E: [email protected]   E: [email protected]   E: [email protected]     E: [email protected]
Log in to download the original file

RFI - civil response letter.pdf · 283 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

    2.3. the transitions to the adjoining verge areas. Please note that the transitions must not create
         trip/fall hazards and Council does not support private retaining structures in the road reserve.
Response
There is considered to be adequate information on the civil plans to determine the intended grading of
the crossover and internal driveway. The grades are not steep and are all in line with AS2890 and therefore
vehicle height templates haven’t been provided as no proposed grade exceeds 1 in 10.
Requested Information:
Issue
No Earthworks Plan and Erosion and Sediment Control Plan has been provided as part of this application.
Council notes that an earthworks approval is not included in the Operational Works application
(OPW22/0090).
Information Required
3. Provide confirmation as to who will be certifying the earthworks required to carry out on site.
4. Provide an Earthworks Plan certified by a suitably qualified persons that demonstrates compliance
     with the recommendations outlined in Tectonics’ Slope Stability Assessment report.
5. Provide an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan certified by a suitably qualified persons that
     demonstrates compliance with the recommendations outlined in Tectonics’ Slope Stability
     Assessment report.
Response
Westera Partners will be responsible for supervising and certifying the civil works on the project with
direct certification of the earthworks from the project geotechnical engineer. Earthworks & erosion and
sediment control plans accompany this response and are considered to be in line with the intent of
Tectonics’ Slope Stability Assessment report.
Requested Information:
Issue
There is insufficient information to demonstrate that the stormwater runoff from the top of the site will
be directed away from the building walls and footings as per the recommendations outlined in Tectonics’
Slope Stability Assessment report. Council has concerns with the potential impacts of the stormwater
discharge (volume, velocity) and the potential to create traffic hazards and cause scour and damage to
the road reserve. Additional detail must be provided in the amended Stormwater Management Plan that
is sufficient to address Council’s concerns
Information Required
Provide an amended Stormwater Management Plan that follows the recommendations outlined in
Tectonics’ Slope Stability Assessment report and addresses Council’s concerns. The amended Stormwater
Management Plan is to be certified by a suitably qualified persons (RPEQ – Registered Professional
Engineer of Queensland).

Response
A cut off drain is documented at the top of the rear retaining wall with indicative pipe connection to the
site LPOD (actual pipe link will be subject to plumbing construction). This is considered to adequately
address the bulk of the potential issues with upslope stormwater.




                                                                                                         2

Page 3

Should you require further information in this regard, please do not hesitate to contact me at the Sunshine
Coast office.

Yours faithfully,




Jared Hill CPEng | RPEQ 19891
Associate | Senior Civil Engineer
Westera Partners Pty Ltd




                                                                                                         3

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.