Council archive · source document
Appendix G - Dewatering Management Plan · MCU25/0053.01
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
Very large file (10.8 MB): may take a few minutes to open.
ADG Consulting Pty Ltd
Table 3 Receiving waters criteria
Parameter Criteria
Physico‐chemical
pH (pH units) 7.8 – 8.31
Dissolved oxygen (% saturation) 85 – 1051
Suspended solids (mg/L) ≤141
Turbidity (NTU) ≤61
Dissolved metals (µg/L)
Aluminium No relevant ANZG criterion available
Arsenic No relevant ANZG criterion available*
Cadmium 5.52
Chromium 4.42
Copper 1.32
Iron No relevant ANZG criterion available
Lead 4.42
Nickel 702
Zinc 82
Mercury 0.42
Total metals (µg/L)
Aluminium No ANZG criteria / 2003
Iron No ANZG criteria / 3003
Table notes:
1. DES (2022). Noosa River environmental values and water quality objectives (moderately disturbed – Noosa River – canals and marinas).
2. ANZG (2018) – Marine water trigger values for 95% species protection (Supersedes ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000)).
3. Criteria subject to expected condition in Development Application (DA) notice by Noosa Shire Council.
Although ADG has not been provided a copy of any DA notice or conditions for the proposed development
(not yet available at the time of writing), based on previous dewatering projects in the Noosa Coast
Region it is expected that total iron and aluminium concentrations as listed in Error! Reference source
not found. (above) are likely to be conditioned by Noosa Shire Council for compliance. It should be noted
that these concentrations are considered to be onerous with respect to the risk‐based (worst‐case)
bioavailable trigger value criteria contained in ANZG 2018 & ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) for marine water
(moderately disturbed) 95% species protection, and are likely to be difficult to achieve given the
groundwater conditions encountered in the locality on previous dewatering projects on the Noosa Coast.
Prior to discharge to the stormwater system or any waterway, discharges are to be tested to meet the
requirements of the ANZG 2018 & ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000) Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water
Quality. There is currently no chemical toxicant trigger value criteria available for total or dissolved (i.e.
bioavailable) concentrations of aluminium or iron for marine or estuarine waters under the Australian
and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality Guidelines (ANZG 2018 &
ANZECC/ARMCANZ 2000 – i.e. ANZECC Guidelines) or the Guidelines for Managing Risks in Recreational
Waters (NHMRC 2008), with regards to managing environmental impacts to the waterway.
In addition, Section 5 (Guidelines for recreational water quality and aesthetics) of the ANZECC/ARMCANZ
(2000) Guidelines (per section 5.2 thereof) was superseded by the Guidelines for Managing Risks in
Recreational Water in 2008 (NHMRC, 2008). Therefore, a reference to the ANZECC/ARMCANZ (2000)
Guidelines is by association and extension a reference to the current 2008 NHMRC Guidelines. The 2008
NHMRC Guidelines contain no criteria for aluminium, and only includes an aesthetic criterion for iron –
noting this is an aesthetic criterion derived from the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines on the basis of
ADG1777.25 Dewatering Management Plan_Rev0_01.05.25 Page 8
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix G - Dewatering Management Plan.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 10.8 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.