Original source · versioned page text
Development objection
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Saskia Winn.
Code Objective Developer’s Assessment Objectors’ Assessment
visual amenity and S80.2 Complies this document the Buildings,
streetscape character; c) Refer Appendix A, Tanker structures, driveways, tanks and fuel
provide adequate separation plan. bowsers are NOT sited to c) provide
to adjoining land uses; and adequate separation to uses; and d)
d) not cause an not cause an environmental nuisance
environmental nuisance to to the adjacent School
neighbouring properties
O83 The associated sale of O83 Complies Does not Comply
goods, including foodstuffs, The associated sale of good The Applicants assertion is
is ancillary to the service will remain ancillary to the unsubstantiated and misleading in the
station use. service station use. extreme. This assertion is simply
designed to play down and hide the
true nature of this venture as a retail
development. Industry data shows
that a service station without a
significant retail component is an
unviable business model.
The Applicant acknowledges that the
Shop component is in total 197m2,
the majority, if not all of which is
available for retail use. The Applicant
claims, although provides no
justification for its idle assertion, that
the retail floor area is some 100m2
This means that the gross floor area
used for the associated retail sale of
goods is more than 50% of the gross
floor area available in the shop.
O84 The layout of the site S84.1- S85.1 Not Applicable Does not Comply
facilities and vehicular The Applicant fails to address this
accesses result in Objective of the code. Vehicle access
unrestricted vehicle access to and egress from the site will be
to and egress from the site. severely restricted by existing vehicle
and pedestrian traffic in the area.
O85 The use of land for a S84.1- S85.1 Not Applicable Does not Comply
service station— a) does not The Applicant fails to address this
impair traffic flow or road Objective of the code.
safety; b) facilitates safe and The proposed service station a) DOES
convenient movement to impair traffic flow and road safety; b)
and from the site through does NOT facilitate safe and
the design and arrangement convenient movement to and from
of vehicular crossovers; and the site through the design and
15
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original