Council archive · source document
Development Application for Permit to Damage Vegetation IDAS Forms 1 & 6 - OPW12/0568
Very large file (14.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Regional Arboricultural Services
Allan John Mulholland
Diploma of Horticulture f Arboric.uftUle
Mobile: 0431 26’1 064
Email. [email protected] au
-
COMMENTS / SUMMARY OF OBSERVATIOI’\S .
-
-
NOTE: This .Property Vegetation Hazard I Risk Assessment" .Vlsual Tree Assessment"
-
(V.T.A.),and .Submission"was based off and compiled with "Acknowledged References. and
prior "Assessments..
After conducting an on-site "Property Hazard I Risk Assessment" and .Visual Tree
Assessment (V.TA)I Evaluation", on this property in question only, I found the "Issue"and
main "Concerns"with the vegetation in question at the time of the Assessments. would be
the .Species","Age classes’, .Sizes.,.Lean of "Subject Trees’, .Structural I
stability Integrity"
and "Locations I PositIons..
This submission consist of two parts .Front and Rear" of thIs high usage commercial property.
As mentioned above there are <1 ~Jmber of issues and concerns that would place tl’lttle
"Subject Trees. into a High "Hazard’Risk" rating; the observations and comments thc.lt,
influences this rating are listed below:
. Poor plant selection
Litigation I Mitigation
Existing, Inevitable and foresee1:costly damage I repairs to this property ar1’:I fW .:.
surrounding infrastructure plus adjacent properties.
. Limb(s) and or entire tree failure
Reduced visual awareness of thIs commercial property.
.
f
CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATION .):.. .
_-
I..’t
’f
. ..
NOTE: This "Property Vegetation Hazard I Risk AssessmentW- "Visual Tree Assessment"
(V.T.A.),and -Report" was based off and compiled with "Acknowledged References" and pr:or
.
Assessments".
Ficus benjamina ’Exoc cs’ (3):
As a result of these Arboricultural assessments it has been determined that this species
of tree in question is acknowledged within numerous reference books, documents and
reports as an ~i9hly undesirable species for an urban commercial and or residential
environment. this is due to the evasive destructive root sy..tem.
To stop existing damage that has already been caused and or prevent the inevitable
damage that this species will cause the required Arboricultural works include:
To remove all Ficus benjam na ’Exotica’ subject trees in question out of this commercial
urban environment.
. Garden Beds 1,2 and 3:
My "Recommendations..given aU considerations to aU the issues and concerns
associated with these .Subject trees. in question, having unsuitable attributes (poor plant
selection)for this site, having an unacceptable risk to safety and as long term
management is unsustainable, r believe these trees should be removed out of this high
usage commercial urban environment and replaced with suitable plantings.
In additional Larry Richard asked if I could met on site and arrange with qualified
Arborlcultural Companies to submit quotes for the required arborlcultural works for this
submission, please find on pages 7 and 8.
Report No. 0956: Noosa Central 4 12 BotllebrlJsh Avenue, Noosa Junai!n. QLD.
-
Property Vegetation Hazard /RIsk Assessment (09.05.2012)
VISUal Tree Assessment VTA (09-05-2012)
Page 3 of9
-
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Development Application for Permit to Damage Vegetation IDAS Forms 1 & 6 - OPW12/0568Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 14.4 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.