Council archive · source document
Notice of Appeal - Altum Constructions V Noosa Shire Appeal No 2097 of 2020 · 132005.1133.13
Level 24 The Blue Tower
12 Creek Street Brisbane Q 4000
GPD Box 7112 Brisbane Q 4001
Anderssen
lawyers
www.anderssens.com.au
Our Ref: DBE:GQ:314800
Contact: Dale Ellerman
Direct Phone: 07 3234 3103
Direct Email: [email protected]
Direct Fax: 07 32118014
22 July 2020
Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Shire Council
PO Box 141
TEWANTIN OLD 4565
By express post and email: [email protected]
Dear Chief Executive Officer
ALTUM CONSTRUCTIONS V NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL
APPEAL NO. 2097 of 2020
We act for the Appellant in the above proceedings.
We enclose, by way of service, a copy of our client's Notice of Appeal filed in the Brisbane Planning and
Environment Court on 21 July 2020. The grounds of appeal are set out in the Notice.
Regards
Anderssen Lawyers Pty Ltd
( b
<o.
received
2 3 JUL tOM —I
VA Noosa Council /
Records A?
Box; R;
[FoliolD:1091835]
Anderssen Lawy r .I Pty Ltd ABN 37 149 372 421 Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 8 pages
Page 2
In the Planning and Environment Court No. of 2020
Held at: Brisbane
Between: ALTUM CONSTRUCTIONS Appellant
And: NOOSA SHIRE COUNCIL Respondent
NOTICE OF APPEAL
Filed on /2020
Filed by: Appellant
Service address: Anderssen Lawyers Pty Ltd
Level 24,12 Creek St, Brisbane, QLD 4000
Phone: 07 3234 3103
Fax: 07 3211 8014
Email: dale<5>anderssens.com.au
ALTUM CONSTRUCTIONS care of Anderssen Lawyers, Level 24, 12 Creek Street, Brisbane in
the State of Queensland appeals to the Planning and Environment Court at Brisbane against
the decision of the Respondent set out in its decision notice dated 23 June 2020 determining
to approve a Change Application in respect of a Development Approval for Material Change
of Use - 140 Multiple Dwelling Units and Associated Facilities - Shop, Restaurant, Multi-
Function Room and Gym over land located at 75 Resort Drive, Noosa Heads (Precinct F),
formerly described as lots 6 and 7 on SP178340 and originally described as lot 3 on
SP221524 (the Subject Land) and seeks the following orders or other relief:
1. The appeal be allowed;
2. Condition 83 of the development approval be amended;
3. The Respondent pay the Appellant's costs; and
Any such further or other orders that this Honourable Court may deem fit.
NOTICE OF APPEAL Anderssen Lawyers Pty Ltd
Filed on behalf of Appellant Level 24,12 Creek St, Brisbane, QLD
4000
Form PEC-1 Ph: 07 3234 3103
Fax: 07 3211 8014
[email protected]
DBE:GQ:314800
Planning Act 2016 Version 1 July 2017
Page 3
2.
The grounds of appeal are:
5. The Subject Land;
(a) forms part of precinct F of the Noosa Springs residential community;
(b) is subject to an existing development approval for multiple dwellings
comprising 140 dwelling units and associated facilities (shop, restaurant,
multi-function room and gym);
(c) was formerly described as lots 6 and 7 on SP178340 and originally
described as lot 3 on SP221524;
(d) is now described as lot 8000 on SP305566, Common Property of Parkridge
Noosa Principal Community Title Scheme 52856 (lot 0 on SP290680),
Common Property of Parkridge Villas Noosa Community Title Scheme
52857 (lot 0 on SP290691), lots 701-704, 801 - 804 and 901-904 on
SP290691, lots 1001 to 1002, 1101 to 1103 and 1201 to 1202 on SP290692,
Common Property for Parkridge Green Noosa South Community Titles
Scheme (lot 0 on SP290696), lots 211 to 215, 221 to 225 and 231 to 233 on
SP290696, Common Property for Parkridge Residences Noosa North
Community Titles Scheme (lot 0 on SP290693), lots 311 to 314, 321 to 324
and 331 to 333 on SP290693, lots 411 to 413, 421 to 423 and 431 to 433 on
SP290698, common property for Parkridge Residences Noosa South
Community Title Scheme (lot 0 on SP305569), lots 511 to 515, 521 to 525
and 531 to 535 on SP305569.
6. Pursuant to the development approval, as amended;
(a) a total of 125 dwellings (comprising buildings 2-12 and 14-17) have been
constructed; and
(b) the facilities building, including the pool, gym, restaurant, shop and lobby
were completed and operational in December 2019.
7. By negotiated decision notice dated 1 November 2007, the Respondent approved a
development application for material change of use -155 multiple dwelling units and
associated facilities - theatre, restaurant, shops and function room in respect of the
Page 4
3.
Subject Land (the Original Development Approval). In respect of the Original
Development Approval;
(a) contained condition 83 which included the requirement for the
development to implement a number of additional noise attenuation
measures and approved operating hours of 7am to 12am; and
(b) a noise assessment was submitted as part of the application with the
assessment based on 150 patrons and an outdoor area of 150m2.
8. The development application the subject of the development approval was impact
assessable.
9. A number of change applications have been approved by the Respondent including;
(a) on 14 May 2019 the Respondent approved change application
132005.1133.09 which included a condition allowing outdoor dining area
to operate until 12am;
(b) by decision notice dated 18 October 2019 the Respondent approved
change application 132005.1133.10 which;
(i) approved an increase in the outdoor dining area from 114m2 to
185m2; and
(ii) amended condition 83 which limited the outdoor dining rooms hours
of operation to 10pm and approved an annotated plan noting the
restriction on operating hours.
10. On 17 December 2019 the Appellant made an application under section 78 of the
Planning Act for a minor change to the development approval (change application).
The change application;
(a) sought, amongst other things;
0) an amendment to condition 83 to allow the operating hours for the
outdoor dining area to be extended to midnight (as approved in the
original development approval); and
Page 5
4.
(N) the removal from the approved plans the annotation on the
approved plan regarding the restricted hours of operation;
(b) was supported by a noise report dated 30 March 2020 which proposed a
limitation on the maximum number of restaurant patrons from 100 to 90
people;
<c) the noise reports submitted with the change application demonstrated
compliance with the relevant noise criteria could be achieved.
11. By decision notice dated 23 June 2020, provided to the Appellant on 24 June 2020,
the Respondent approved the change application subject to amendments to the
conditions, in particular condition 83 was amended by the Respondent to;
"83. The development shall comply with the Noise Management Plan (Report No.
R19084/D3295Rev.4/30.03.20) prepared by David Moore & Associates and dated 30
March 2020 to the reasonable satisfaction of Council, including
(a) The necessary and appropriate noise control measures incorporated into
the fagade of the apartments and within the restaurant/cafe in the Resort
Facilities Building. These measures shall include;
0) Upgraded glazing and air-conditioning to the potentially affected
apartments;
(H) Strategically placed wing walls on balconies to screen the apartment
and balconies from outdoor dining areas;
(M) Revised hours of operation to no later than midnight for the
restaurant /cafe (indoor area only);
H The outdoor dining areas associated with the restaurant/cafe use is
to operate between the hours of Gam and 10pm only;
M After 10pm, all patrons must be within the building confines with
doors/windows closed, except for the ingress and egress of patrons
and staff;
Page 6
5.
(vi) The underside of all roof elements over outdoor dining areas
associated with the cafe use are to be lined with acoustic
absorptive lining minimum NRC 0.7;
(vii) Outdoor dining is confined to the 185m2 roofed area shown on the
approved plans;
(viii) All amplified noise at the premises must be conducted through a
sound limiting device at all times to ensure that noise
does not exceed the following:
(1) during the daytime and evening (0600 to 2200) must not exceed
92 dB(A) LWA, which is equivalent to 75 dB(A) + 5 = 80 dB(A)
LAeq, adj, Tat 3 metres from the speakers;
(ix) Any live performer must be required to play through the in-house
system. No speakers (in addition to the in-house system) are
permitted on site;
(b) Within 20 business days of the commencement of trading of the
restaurant/cafe use, Council must be provided with a Noise Management
Plan which is specific to the use and prepared on the basis of physical and
technical assessment of noise from the restaurant/cafd use, including both
internal and external use areas. The noise management plan must suitably
detail physical and management noise control measures;
(c) The applicant must advise prospective purchasers that a Noise
Management Plan has been prepared to manage noise emissions related to
the development.
(0) The Noise Management Plan referred to in Condition 83(b) shall be
incorporated in perpetuity in the By-Laws of the Body Corpfor the whole
development;
(e) The Noise Management Plan shall include a process for dealing with
complaints and specify that the Restaurant/Cafe
Management and Body Carp Manager be responsible for dealing with any
noise complaints."
Page 7
6.
12. The Appellant appeals against the amendment of the development conditions made
by the Respondent in respect of the changes and seeks an order that condition 83 be
amended, to reflect that previously approved in change application 13005.1133.09
(with the reference to the updated noise management plan included), i.e. to read;
"The development shall comply with the noise management plan contained in the
report prepared by David Moore & Associates and dated 30 March, 2020 to the
reasonable satisfaction of the Council: -
83.1. The necessary and appropriate noise control measures incorporated into
the fagade of the apartments and within the restaurant/cafe in the Resort
Facilities Building. These measures shall include:
83.1.1. Upgraded glazing and air-conditioning to the potentially affected
apartments;
83.1.2. Strategically placed wing walls on balconies to screen the apartment
and balconies from outdoor dining areas;
83.1.3. Installation of a roof over the outdoor dining area with the
absorption to the underside should be explored;
83.1.4. Revised hours of operation to no later than midnight.
83.2. Formulate and implement a Noise Management Plan to deal with noise
emissions from the premises including patron noise.
83.3. The applicant must advise prospective purchasers that a noise management
plan has been prepared to manage noise emissions related to the
development.
83.4. The Noise Management Plan referred to in Condition 83.2 shall be
incorporated in perpetuity in the By-Laws of the Body Corp for the building.
83.5. The Noise Management Plan shall include a process for dealing with
complaints and specify that the Restaurant Management and Body Corp
Manager be responsible for dealing with any noise complaints."
Page 8
7.
13. The change application should be approved, as proposed by the Appellant on the
grounds set out below.
14. The proposed changes are minor for the purpose of schedule 2 of the Planning Act
2016, in particular the changes would not result in a substantially different
development.
15. If a development application for the development, including the change, was made
when the change application was made, would not cause:
(a) the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
(b) there to be any referral to any additional referral agency.
16. The change application should be approved, as proposed by the Appellant, as;
(a) it is a minor change;
(b) the proposed changes have been supported by a detailed noise
assessment;
(c) the development has incorporated significant attenuation works to both
the facilities building and residential building;
(d) noise monitoring and testing has been undertaken which demonstrates
that the noise standards are able to be achieved by the development, as
proposed to be conditioned;
(e) the restaurant is subject to liquor licencing requirements; and
(f) the development includes a complaints handling procedure.
17. In the premises of the above:
(a) the appeal should be allowed; and
(b) the change application should be approved.
Signed:
Description: Anderssen Lawyers Pty Ltd^Solicitors for the Appellant
Dated: 21 July 2020
Page 9
8.
If you are named as a respondent in this notice of appeal and wish to be heard in
this appeal you must:
(c) within 10 business days after being served with a copy of this Notice of
Appeal, file an Entry of Appearance in the Registry where this notice of
appeal was filed or where the court file is kept; and
(d) serve a copy of the Entry of Appearance on each other party.
The Entry of Appearance should be in Form PEC-5 for the Planning and
Environment Court.
If you are entitled to elect to be a party to this appeal and you wish to be heard in
this appeal you must:
(a) within 10 business days of receipt of this Notice of Appeal, file a Notice of
Election in the Registry where this Notice of Appeal was filed or where
the court file is kept; and
(b) serve a copy of the Notice of Election on each other party.
The Notice of Election should be in Form PEC-6 for the Planning and Environment
Court.
Used in these records
Notice of Appeal - Altum Constructions V Noosa Shire Appeal No 2097 of 2020Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.4 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.