Council archive · source document
Notice of Appeal - Altum Constructions V Noosa Shire Appeal No 2097 of 2020 · 132005.1133.13
7.
13. The change application should be approved, as proposed by the Appellant on the
grounds set out below.
14. The proposed changes are minor for the purpose of schedule 2 of the Planning Act
2016, in particular the changes would not result in a substantially different
development.
15. If a development application for the development, including the change, was made
when the change application was made, would not cause:
(a) the inclusion of prohibited development in the application; or
(b) there to be any referral to any additional referral agency.
16. The change application should be approved, as proposed by the Appellant, as;
(a) it is a minor change;
(b) the proposed changes have been supported by a detailed noise
assessment;
(c) the development has incorporated significant attenuation works to both
the facilities building and residential building;
(d) noise monitoring and testing has been undertaken which demonstrates
that the noise standards are able to be achieved by the development, as
proposed to be conditioned;
(e) the restaurant is subject to liquor licencing requirements; and
(f) the development includes a complaints handling procedure.
17. In the premises of the above:
(a) the appeal should be allowed; and
(b) the change application should be approved.
Signed:
Description: Anderssen Lawyers Pty Ltd^Solicitors for the Appellant
Dated: 21 July 2020
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Notice of Appeal - Altum Constructions V Noosa Shire Appeal No 2097 of 2020Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 3.4 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.