Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

Attachment 6 - Stormwater Management Plan and Engineering Response. · MCU23/0078

of 100

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.

Very large file (32.8 MB): may take a few minutes to open.

Log in to see the plans as drawn

Original PDF page 94, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

Civil Response:

The SWMP has been revised to incorporate increased rainfall intensities (a uniform 20% increase) to account for
future predicted storm event intensity and duration increases in the Year 2100, in accordance with the Noosa
City Plan. These increases have been applied both to the flood assessment of the natural drainage channel, and
when sizing the proposed stormwater detention.

The flood study determined that under existing conditions for the 1% AEP flood event in the Year 2100, the water
level at the existing culvert system below Hoffmann Drive (south-west of the site) is above existing roadway
levels. As such, if stormwater run-off from the development site is not detained up to the 1% AEP flood event,
water depths over Hoffmann Drive will increase for the 1% AEP flood event due to the proposed development.
This is not considered an acceptable outcome and thus detention up to the 1% AEP flood event is proposed to
ensure no worsening of downstream flood levels at the Hoffmann Drive culvert crossing.


Issue – Stormwater Quality – Item 40:

Provide a revised SWMP and design drawings which achieve compliance with PO7 of the Water Quality and Drainage
Code and PO3 of the sustainable Building Design Code

Civil Response:

The SWMP has been revised and proposes bio-retention treatment systems only to achieve the required water
quality run-off objectives, in accordance with the Noosa City Plan.

Issue – Stormwater Quality – Item 41:

Provide updated plans and a SWMP which incorporates rainwater/roofwater collection and resuse at the site, sufficient
to supply external non-potable fixtures such as landscape irrigation and bin washdown and internal non-potable fixtures
such as toilet flushing.

Civil Response:

The SWMP and Serviceability Report have both been revised noting proposed locations for roof water harvesting
tanks for water re-use across the development site. Following the conservative methodology that any roof water
harvesting tanks may already be full prior to significant rainfall events, these tanks were not factored into any of
the stormwater quantity run-off calculations and modelling.


Yours faithfully,
BORNHORST & WARD PTY LTD




Per: STEWART GRANT
CIVIL ENGINEER




                                                                                           Page 2 of 2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
32.8 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Attachment 6 - Stormwater Management Plan and Engineering Response..pdf · 32.8 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.