Original source · versioned page text
2020-02-20 Ordinary Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA 20 FEBRUARY 2020 GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING RECOMMENDATIONS 17 FEBRUARY 2020 - Crs. Frank Wilkie (Chair), Jess Glasgow, Ingrid Jackson, Joe Jurisevic, Brian Stockwell and Tony Wellington 1 MCU18/0166 - DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE SERVICE AND UTILITY - TYPE 3 TOWER, SITUATED AT 244 TABLELANDS ROAD, COORAN Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Jurisevic Seconded: Cr Stockwell That Council note the report by the Development Planners to the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting dated 11 February 2020 regarding Application No MCU18/0166 for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use Service and Utility - Type 3 Tower, situated at 244 Tablelands Rd, Cooran and: A. Refuse the application for the following reasons: 1. The proposed infrastructure is located in an area identified by the SEQ Regional Plan as being of regionally significant scenic amenity and the proposal compromises this scenic amenity and regional landscape of the area. 2. The proposed development is inconsistent with Desired Environmental Outcome 3.1.3 m) viii of the Noosa Plan as the proposed development is visually prominent in the view from premises along Tablelands Road. 3. The development application proposes a use that is inconsistent in the Rural Zone of the Mary River Catchment Locality; 4. The proposal is contrary to Specific Outcome O2 and Overall Outcome 8.7.2 a)iii, k)iii, v) and mm)ii of the Mary River Catchment Locality Code as, 4.1 The visual amenity enjoyed by users of nearby premises is adversely impacted; and 4.2 The scale and form of the structure is not integrated into the landform and landscape; and 4.3 The siting of the proposed structure does not protect significant views to Mt Cooroora, Mt Cooran and Mt Pinbarren; and 4.4 The scenic values and rural amenity of the locality are adversely impacted; 5. The proposal is contrary to Overall Outcome 14.37.2 b) and 14.37.2 c) and Specific Outcome O10 of the Infrastructure Uses Code as the proposed infrastructure, 5.1. Detracts from the visual amenity of the rural and residential amenity enjoyed by residents and visitors to the area and does not satisfactorily visually integrate with the landscape; and 5.2. Fails to co-locate with the existing telecommunications nearby. 6. The proposed tower, if approved, would be afforded immunity under the Telecommunications Act 1997 enabling further extension up to 5 metres without further reference to Council which would exacerbate the visual amenity impacts; 7. The visual impact on a number of premises in the area, which have direct line of sight in their viewshed, is considered significant and unacceptable for those residents. 8. The applicant’s visual impact assessment is deficient to satisfactorily determine the degree and extent of visual impacts from the proposed development and impacts are likely to be greater than has been currently identified in the reports. B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016. Carried unanimously. Page 11 of 18
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.