Original source · versioned page text
2020-02-20 Ordinary Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA 20 FEBRUARY 2020 7 FURTHER REPORT - RAL18/0023 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURATION OF A LOT (1 LOT INTO 23 LOTS) AT 28 EENIE CREEK ROAD, NOOSAVILLE Cr Wellington declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the Local Government Act 2009) as in 2009, prior to his election to the Sunshine Coast Council, he was a co-respondent with Sunshine Coast Council in an appeal against a refusal to expand the Noosa Civic shopping centre. Cr Wellington advised that the appeal was for a significantly different development application than the application currently before Council. Cr Wellington believed that he could consider this item impartially and in the public interest and requested to remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter. Cr Jackson declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the Local Government Act 2009) as in 2015, prior to her election to Council and during her time as Honorary Secretary of the Noosa Parks Association, Cr Jackson was signatory to a submission regarding an application on the site. Cr Jackson believed that she could consider this item impartially and in the public interest and requested to remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter. Cr Stockwell declared a perceived conflict of interest in this matter (as defined in section 175D of the Local Government Act 2009) as prior to his election to Council and during his time as President of the Noosa Shire Residents & Ratepayers Association, Cr Stockwell was signatory to a submission regarding an application on the site and made public statements regarding the application. Cr Stockwell believed that he could consider this item impartially and in the public interest and requested to remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter. Pursuant to section 175E(4) of the Local Government Act 2009, the remaining Councillors gave consideration to whether the conflicts were real conflicts or perceived conflicts and whether Crs. Wellington, Jackson and Stockwell may participate in the meeting for the debate and vote on this matter or whether they must leave the meeting for the debate and vote on this matter. Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Wilkie Seconded: Cr Jurisevic That Councillors note the perceived conflict of interest declaration of Cr Wellington and resolve that this represents a perceived conflict of interest in this matter and Cr Wellington may remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter. Carried unanimously. Crs. Wellington, Jackson and Stockwell did not vote on the above motion. Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Wilkie Seconded: Cr Glasgow That Councillors note the perceived conflict of interest declaration of Cr Jackson and resolve that this represents a perceived conflict of interest in this matter and Cr Jackson may remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter. Carried unanimously. Crs. Wellington, Jackson and Stockwell did not vote on the above motion. Committee Recommendation Moved: Cr Wilkie Seconded: Cr Jurisevic That Councillors note the perceived conflict of interest declaration of Cr Stockwell and resolve that this represents a perceived conflict of interest in this matter and Cr Stockwell may remain in the meeting room to participate in the debate and vote on this matter. Carried unanimously. Crs. Wellington, Jackson and Stockwell did not vote on the above motion. Page 15 of 18
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.