Original source · versioned page text
Appendix F - Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan
Plans and drawings
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnBushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan v1 NCES REF: J000669 Lot 2 on RP131369 – 108 Black Mountain Range Road, Black Mountain society will not accept this risk and measures are to be put in place to reduce risks to at least a tolerable level. AS/NZS ISO 31000:2018 defines ‘Likelihood’ as the chance that something might happen. Likelihood can be defined, determined, or measured objectively or subjectively and can be expressed either qualitatively or quantitatively (using mathematics). The following ‘likelihood’ categories for the probability of the assessed bushfire attack mechanisms impacting the assessment area have been adopted within this assessment: · Likely - Will probably occur. · Unlikely - Could occur but doubtful. 4.2 Risk from Identified Hazardous Vegetation The Plan of Development depicts the building envelope within proposed Lot 2 external of the mapped Potential Impact Buffer Area. The bushfire risk acting on the proposed building envelope, in the absence of additional mitigation measures being implemented, is detailed in Table 2. Table 2 - Risk Assessment (Lot 2) Direction & Slope North East South West 12º Distance to hazardous N/A N/A N/A ~170m vegetation VHC’s - - - 9.1 Attack Mechanism Smoke* Not Not Not Not assessed assessed assessed assessed Ember** N/A N/A N/A Likely - Acceptable Radiant Heat*** Likely – Tolerable 0.9kW/m² N/A N/A N/A (refer Appendix 2) Flame**** N/A N/A N/A Likely - Acceptable * Risk of smoke impact has not been assessed. Smoke can travel long distances and exhibit a variety of densities and composition. It is therefore not readily practicable to determine the separation distances needed to attain the various risk classes. Furthermore, individuals will react differently to smoke impacts whereas individuals will generally exhibit similar reactions to direct flame and radiant heat. ** Sites <50m = Intolerable risk, >50m-<100m = Tolerable and >100m = Acceptable. *** 1kW/m² radiant heat exposure is considered the upper limit of tolerable indefinite radiant heat exposure to humans (QFES 2019). **** Assets located within 1.5 x the modelled flame length from the Flamesol output are assigned an Intolerable Risk. Assets located within >1.5 - <3 x the modelled flame length from the Flamesol output are assigned a Tolerable Risk. Assets located >3 x the modelled flame length from the Flamesol output are assigned an Acceptable Risk. 4.3 Summary Vegetation to the west to north-west of the site is located within a high-risk fire pathway to the site given the typical high fire danger conditions attributed to north-westerly winds. The Plan of Development provides an approximate 170m setback to VHC 9.1 open Eucalypt forest occurring to the west of Black Mountain Range Road. The risk of fire impact from the west is therefore restricted to an acceptable risk of direct flame contact and ember attack and a tolerable level of risk from radiant heat impact. The risk of grassfire movement is also noted as inherently present. The identified severity of risk is anticipated to be reduced to an © 2021 18
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.