Original source · versioned page text
MCU22/0118 – DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE – SHORT-TERM ACCOMMODATION AT 94 & 142 NOOSA DR, NOOSA HEADS (Referred from Planning & Environment Committee dated 7 November 2023 - Item 5.1) · ATTACHMENT 1 – OFFICER’S REPORT
Very large file (13.9 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
Matters Raised Comments
• Increasing vehicle movements in and
around development and adjoining
roadways increases the chances of
vehicle strikes, causing death and injury to
koalas.
• The proposal does not meet community
expectations of Council decision making
regarding preservation and enhancement
of koala habitat in Noosa Shire, and if
approved, would diminish public
confidence and trust in Council.
Weyba Creek Agreed - as outlined in the above assessment,
the proposal does not meet the environmental
• Weyba Creek and wetlands need to be
outcomes of the Strategic Framework, Zone
protected – erosion and runoff impacts –
Codes and Biodiversity, Waterways and
mangroves vital habitat, filtration
Wetlands Overlay Code.
compromised
• Weyba Creek is still relatively pristine and
devoid of homes. It still has old seagrass
beds and natural oyster beds (filtration
feeders), and is lined with mangroves,
which are nurseries for juvenile fish.
Development fly /run-off will be detrimental
to this fragile ecosystem
Oversupply of Short-term accommodation It is acknowledged that the site is partially
(STA) zoned as Tourist Accommodation, in which
Short-term accommodation is a consistent use
• Noosa is experiencing overcrowding and
in this location, with the planning scheme
does not need additional STA
partially zoning this area of land for tourism
• Excessive STA is resulting in loss of development. However, the proposal to
amenity for residents develop within the Environmental
• No additional STA should be approved Management and Conservation (EM&C) Zone
whilst there is an undersupply of portion of the lot is considered an
permanent accommodation overdevelopment of the site and is not
• Noosa’s very viability - its economy; social consistent with the intent of the scheme in
fabric; residential amenity and health and relation to this zone and/or development for
welfare of residents - is being adversely tourism purposes within the Shire.
affected by too many STA.
Community Expectations The proposal to develop short-term
accommodation within the Environmental
• Size of development is large and not in
Management and Conservation Zone portion
keeping with the surrounds. Could be
of the lot is considered an overdevelopment of
viewed as overdeveloping the area;
the site and is not consistent with Noosa Plan
• conflicts with the character outcomes 2020 or the community’s expectations of
sought by the planning scheme and values development within the region.
of the biosphere that is Noosa
Cultural Significance Requirements of the Aboriginal Cultural
Heritage Act 2003 sit outside of the
• Area is culturally significant to the Kabi
requirements of the Planning Act 2016,
Kabi People and requires a cultural
however, an Advisory Note is generally
heritage assessment and management
included on Development Permits (where an
plan with the Traditional Owners,
application is approved) notifying applicants
otherwise is a breach of the Qld Govt
that there may be a requirement to establish a
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003
Cultural Heritage Management Plan and/or
Page 35 of 38
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.