Original source · versioned page text
Appendix 3- Noosa restoration assessment report- Including Expert Elicitation Minutes
Attached to the e-mail Enclosure 5-Restoration Plan.eml, inside Operational Works Application OPW17/0016.
11
Option Key actions Consequence for chosen indicators Other benefits Key uncertainties Cost Pre-mortem
estimate
Prawns Bream Whiting Mullet Birds Yabbies Crabs Biodiver
sity
through increase habitat blocks sediment habitat
hard substrate and What substrate to use
habitat mosaics
Prawn Restocking of Improved water Unclear as to the Requires Displacement of existing
restocking prawns into the quality current status of the further species
lakes and river Improved benthic stocks and therefore if info Change in fishing
habitat quality and restocking would be practices / target species
sediment turnover
Increased
required
Current carrying
No measurable
improvement in fisheries
recreational fishing capacity of lakes and
benefits through DIY river
bait and target Displacement of rare
species species
Restoration Assess current Improved water Current condition of Initial No measurable
of Kin Kin inputs and status of quality the catchment $100k; up improvement in fisheries
catchment catchment Improved Extent of erosion / to
Improved land
§ § § § § § connectivity for fish accretion $1M+for
management § § species actions
practices “Insurance” for
other restoration
options
Habitat Improve habitat Visual indicator of Current carrying $100K Birds don’t use artificial
provision for availability for iconic restoration success capacity for raptors in roosts
Raptors species raptor Increased the estuary Not tangible benefit to
species by community Extent of roost use community
supplemental engagement Possible mortality from
feeding Community human interaction
Local education # monitoring program
campaign and Estuarine health
initiative indicator
Increased tourism
opportunities
North Shore Create a Increase in fish Size of impact $200K Community backlash
management “Restoration Zone” movement / energy Moving fishing No measurable
/vehicle to restrict access transfer between pressure elsewhere improvement in fisheries
closure Provide a buffer estuary and coast Poaching
between Possible increased
recreational and
commercial
* #^
larval fish supply /
food for other
activities species
Ensure that any Reduced fishing
conservation zone pressure
includes both
– Positive effect on indicator species * shorebirds (e.g. migratory waders, oystercatchers etc.); # raptors; ^ seabirds; § consequence not able to be assessed due to a
– Negative effect on indicator species lack of specificity about the actions to be taken
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.