Original source · versioned page text
Appendix 3- Noosa restoration assessment report- Including Expert Elicitation Minutes
Attached to the e-mail Enclosure 5-Restoration Plan.eml, inside Operational Works Application OPW17/0016.
13
Option Key actions Consequence for chosen indicators Other benefits Key uncertainties Cost Pre-mortem
estimate
Prawns Bream Whiting Mullet Birds Yabbies Crabs Biodiver
sity
education product Actual catch rates and
Increased habitat current stock
value and assessment
productivity
Reduction in habitat
destruction
Transform Transform gill net Improved efficiency Current fish stocks and ? Backlash from
gill-net industry to high in commercial impact of fishing commercial fishers
fishery to value line caught practices practice Inability to adopt new
higher value
fishery
industry
Improved water
quality
fishing practices
No improvement in fish
Increased stocks
commercial value of
product
Stormwater Improve the quality Enhance biogenic Magnitude of $500K+ No tangible benefit to
management of water runoff habitat quality and improvement possible water quality
flowing into the resilience due to given there is limited
estuary through reduced external future development
wetlands and other § § § § § § § § pressures
design features such Increased viability of
as flow restrictors restoration success
and pollution traps
– Positive effect on indicator species * shorebirds (e.g. migratory waders, oystercatchers etc.); # raptors; ^ seabirds; § consequence not able to be assessed due to a
– Negative effect on indicator species lack of specificity about the actions to be taken
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.