Original source · versioned page text
Attachment 4 - Stormwater Managment Plan
The original of this document is very large (17.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnSQIDEP Evaluation SPEL Basin, Sippy Downs
4. Discussion
Our independent evaluation finds that:
1) As shown in Table 1, The testing regime and results comply with SQIDEP protocol
requirements.
2) In addition, the catchment parameters, expected runoff concentrations, and rainfall
mapping to event recording are within standard, or expected guidelines though it is
noted this site is considered “clean” or lightly loaded relative to default EMC values
adopted in MUSIC. Of itself, this implies that, based on diminishing returns, the
performance claims are more difficult to achieve and therefore conservative however
the device itself may demonstrate clogging more prematurely on more heavily loaded
sites. In this sense the field test may not have stress tested the device as much as it
will experience in the real world. None the less the claim is considered valid and
generally representative.
3) The field study appears to be a scientifically sound study and would be repeatable
under similar conditions which it is noted are deemed representative.
4) There will be some sites where media life is reduced due to higher sediment loads
and we note this SQIDEP claim and this independent evaluation do not involve a
claim against expected media life. This however is addressed in part by the need for
the asset owner to observe draining times and if draining times fall below 2 hours to
then investigate if the media is blocked and needs replacing.
5) The cation exchange capacity of the media is reportedly very high and indicates the
CEC is very unlikely to limit media life.
6) We were unable to assess the longer term vegetative health of the system though
during the investigation rigorous and healthy plant growth was evident.
7) We did not find evidence of cherry picking of storm events.
8) We found that the dominant forms nitrogen in this study were dissolved nitrogen
indicating that filtration, absorption and adsorption are occurring.
Final Agreed Pollution Reduction Performance
The final agreed pollutant reduction performance can be seen in
Figure 6 and includes total suspended solids, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and gross
pollutant claims.
30
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.