Council archive · source document
Minor Change Request report INCE Arakoon · MCU19/0008.02
Given the encroachments are to the first floor and its roof eave and the balcony is 4.1m above NGL and the eave is 7m above NGL, it is unlikely these structures will have any impact on the natural cycle of the foreshore. It is also very unlikely that wave overtopping will occur because of the encroachment, noting how high the structures above NGL. Noting also that these structures are not unlike uncovered cantilevered balconies in that they are cantilevered and significantly above NGL and the coastal foredune system. An exception is the small portion of building (starting from the first floor) which encroaches into the 15m setback. This portion does not extend to the ground level but sits over the top of the lower level and will not be subject to any impacts of or will not be impacted by any coastal cycles. The setback to the seaward boundary allows for natural processes of erosion and accretion to occur naturally, including as a result of sea level rise and therefore meets the relevant Overall outcome, PO and AO’s of the Coastal Protection and Scenic Amenity Overlay Code. An updated geotechnical report prepared by Pacific Geotech and stormwater management plan prepared by SCG is provided to ensure dune stability. Figure 5 – Stormwater and driveway preliminary engineering detail plans (SCG).
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Request report INCE Arakoon.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.5 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.