ASTP - MCU.pdf

 Side Setbacks           Between 4.5m-
 (Planning Scheme –      7.5m              2 metres                 2 metres                 Complies
 alternative             Greater than      2.5 metres               2.5 metres               Complies
 provision to QDC)       7.5m
 Rear Setbacks (Planning Scheme –          6 metres                 6 metres                 Complies
 alternative provision to QDC)
 Southern Side Built-to-Boundary Garage    Max. Height 4.5m         4.5 metres               Complies
 (QDC provision)                           Mean Height 3.5m         3.5 metres               Complies
                                           Max. Length 9m           7.98 metres              Complies
 Garage Doors (Planning Scheme –           Maximum 3 x Doors and    1 x Garage Door and      Complies
 alternative provision to QDC)             6.7 metre width          Max. 6 metres
 Driveway Width (Planning Scheme –         Max. 6 metres & Max. 1   6 metres & 1 Pathway     Complies
 alternative provision to QDC) + Council   Pathway
 Standard Drawing (RS-049)                 Kerb Invert = Max. 4m    4.5m                     Non-Complying
                                           W2 = Max. 3m             3.7m                     Non-Complying
                                           Prop. Boundary = Max.    4.1m                     Complies
                                           5m
 Landslide Hazard Area                     Development is not       Driveway is located in   Non-complying
                                           located on Landslide     moderate hazard area
                                           Hazard Area


3     Statutory Provisions
This section of the Town Planning Report describes the statutory planning framework applicable to the
proposed development application.


3.1       State Government Considerations
3.1.1 State Planning Policy
The State Planning Policy is identified as being predominantly reflected in the Planning Scheme, with the
exception of Bushfire Hazard Mapping, which reverts to the policy for assessment where applicable. It is
noted that the site is mapped by the SPP as being subject to Bushfire Hazard, as such the necessary
sections of the State Planning Policy have been addressed below. As demonstrated in Figure 4 below, the
Dwelling House will be positioned within the Potential Impact Buffer overlay extent.




Figure 3 SPP Bushfire Hazard Mapping (SPP 2017)
The proposed development complies with the relevant Assessment Benchmarks for ‘Natural Hazards, Risk
and Resilience’, specifically relating to Bushfire Hazard, through the development:
      •    Minimising potential impacts of Bushfire Hazard by not proposing new development within areas
           of Medium, High or Very High Bushfire Hazard or seeking to build on a site that is heavily
           vegetated (sparse exotic vegetation in garden beds evident only);

Our Ref: 241021                                                                                  Page 4 of 9