Council archive · source document
PR132938_161208_FINAL- s369_PermissibleChangeRequest · 132008.1128
Attached to the e-mail 132008.1128.01 Request to change and extend development approval - - Grasstree Court, Sunrise Beach.
prohibited development.
Further to the above, Statutory Guideline 06/09 – Substantially different development when
changing applications and approvals provides guidance to assist in determining whether a
change may constitute substantially different development and whether a change is therefore a
minor change.
Substantially Different Development Test
Substantially Different includes: Consideration of the proposed changes
Involves a new use with different or The request to extend the relevant period of the approval
additional impacts will not result in any physical changes to the approval
and therefore will not involve a new use with different or
additional impacts.
Results in the application applying The request to extend the relevant period of the approval
to a new parcel of land will not result in any physical changes to the approval
and therefore will not result in the application applying to
a new parcel of land.
Dramatically changes the built form The request to extend the relevant period of the approval
in terms of scale, bulk and will not result in any physical changes to the approval
appearance and therefore will not dramatically change the built form
in terms of scale, bulk and appearance.
Changes the ability of the proposal The request to extend the relevant period of the approval
to operate as intended. For will not result in any physical changes to the approval
example, reducing the size of a and therefore will not change the ability of the proposal to
retail complex may reduce the operate as intended.
capacity of the complex to service
the intended catchment
Removes a component that is The request to extend the relevant period of the approval
integral to the operation of the will not result in any physical changes to the approval
development and therefore does not involve removing a component of
the development that is integral to the operation.
Significantly impacts on traffic flow The request to extend the relevant period of the approval
and the transport network, such as will not result in any physical changes to the approval
increasing traffic to the site and therefore will not significantly impact on traffic flow
and the transport network.
Introduces new impacts or The request to extend the relevant period of the approval
increases the severity of known will not result in any physical changes to the approval
impacts and therefore will not introduce new impacts or increase
the severity of known impacts.
Removes an incentive or offset The request to extend the relevant period of the approval
component that would have will not result in any physical changes to the approval
balanced a negative impact of the and therefore will not remove an incentive or offset
development component of the original application.
Impacts on infrastructure provision, The request to extend the relevant period of the approval
location or demand will not result in any impacts on infrastructure provision,
location or demand.
In summary, the proposed change to the development approval is considered a Permissible
Change in accordance with the relevant tests under Section 367 of the Act.
7.0 Relevant Entities
In accordance with Section 372 of the Act, a copy of this request will be given to the concurrence
PR132938: Sections 383 and 369 – Request to Change and Extend Development Approval Page 9
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PR132938_161208_FINAL- s369_PermissibleChangeRequest.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 93 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.