Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

response to information request 92 hilton · MCU26/0080

of 3

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

2 October 2026


Noosa Council
[email protected]



RE:      Response to Information Request (MCU26/0080) – Dwelling House - situated at 92
         Hilton Tce, Noosaville

Council issued a further information request on 9 September 2026. The following additional
information provides a response to Council’s request items:
      1. Provide revised plans and detail a compliant boundary setback.

The applicant has amended the plans to provide a 750mm setback for the single storey garage to
the western boundary. Deep landscaping consisting of lilly pillys is provided along this boundary to
ensure the bulk of the building is not readily visible and the amenity is maintained between the
neighbours. This part of the building is 8.9m long, which also provides some articulation to the built
form providing for bike storage in front of the cars.




      2. Provide supporting information demonstrating how the nominated car parking
         space will be accessed and utilised, including vehicle manoeuvring arrangements
         and compliance with relevant parking design standards.
      3. Confirm whether the parking space is intended to form part of the approved
         development or whether it has been included on the plans in error. If included in
         error, provide amended plans removing the space accordingly.

The parking space at the front of the site in front of the garage has been removed.
Full text of the other 2 pages

Page 2

    4. Provide to scale gross floor area and site cover plans that clearly delineate the
       development’s coverage and floor area in accordance with the relevant
       administrative terms.

Updated plans are provided showing updated GFA and Site Cover calculations. The site cover
required is 775m2 (40%) and the development proposes 751m2 (38.5%). The GFA required is
775m2 (40%) and the development proposes 761m2 (39%)




    5. Provide revised plans nominating the maximum Reduced Level (RL) of the building.

The elevations and sections have been updated to show correct building heights, as well as
providing a height blanket showing only the pitched roof forms through the height plane.




    6. Limited fencing detail has been provided in support of the application. Front fencing
       treatments are assessable, please revise plans accordingly, or otherwise
       acknowledge compliance will be conditioned.

Additional landscaping and fence details are provided on the ground floor plan, with all fencing
setback between 1m and 2m.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




                                                                                                      Page 2 of 3

Page 3

Pursuant to the Development Assessment Rules, the applicant has given the assessment manager
the information requested. Please proceed with the processing of the application at your earliest
convenience.

If you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to contact myself.

Regards,




Jack Lewis B.Sc Hons UNSW M.Plan Otago RPIA
Planner/Director
Pivotal Perspective Pty Ltd
0406 334 227




                                                                                       Page 3 of 3

Used in these records

About this file

File size
708 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

response to information request 92 hilton.pdf · 708 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.