Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Council archive · source document

Geotechnical Report (1) · MCU21/0212

of 52

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (10.7 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

                               PROPOSED RESIDENCE
                               66 SEAVIEW TERRACE, SUNSHINE BEACH

5.2       Stability Assessment
The risk assessment for this project has been carried out following AGS 2007 Practice Note Guidelines for
Landslide Risk Management. Relative levels of risk and their implications are given in Table 2.
Table 2: Stability Risk Levels
 Risk Level            Example Implications(1)
                       Unacceptable without treatment. Extensive detailed investigation and research, planning
       Very High
 VH                    and implementation of treatment options essential to reduce risk to Low; may be too
       Risk
                       expensive and not practical. Work likely to cost more than value of property.
                       Unacceptable without treatment. Detailed investigation, planning and implementation of
 H     High Risk       treatment options required to reduce risk to Low. Work would cost a substantial sum in
                       relation to the value of the property.
                       May be tolerated in certain circumstances (subject to regulators’ approval) but requires
       Moderate
 M                     investigation, planning and implementation of treatment options to reduce risk to Low.
       Risk
                       Treatment options to reduce to Low risk should be implemented as soon as practicable.
                       Usually acceptable to regulators. Where treatment has been required to reduce the risk to
 L     Low Risk
                       this level, ongoing maintenance required.
       Very Low
 VL                    Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance procedures.
       Risk
 Note: (1) The implications for a particular situation are to be determined by all parties to the risk assessment and may
 depend on the nature of the property at risk; these are only given as a general guide.

Considering the existing site conditions (Ref. Section 2), and subject to the implementation of
recommendations given below, it is assessed that there would be a Low (L) Risk of global slope instability
affecting the proposed development. Regulators (NSC) normally require that a Very Low or Low Risk of
landslide affecting the property must be demonstrated to enable development approval. Summarised in Table
3 is our qualitative assessment of landslide risk for the development site. A summary of qualitative
terminology for use in assessing risk to property is attached in Appendix C (taken from AGS 2007).




23 November 2021
Report No. 21370-001-Rev0                                   11

Used in these records

About this file

File size
10.7 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Geotechnical Report (1).pdf · 10.7 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.