Council archive · source document
Decision Notice - Approved by Delegation of Authority - OPW25 0073 (As Published) · OPW25/0073
10. As a general rule, a site is determined to have achieved effective short-term stabilisation if
at the time of the plan sealing inspection:
a. Methods of stabilisation are:
• appropriate for slopes and slope lengths; and
• are consistent with best practice environmental management practices such as in
the Manual for Erosion and Sediment Control or the IECA Manual; and
b. Stormwater runoff from the site is not currently, and is not likely to result in visible
evidence of sedimentation or erosion, or lead to water contamination.
If at the time of request for plan sealing, the method of short-term stabilisation has not
achieved a level of stability that Council's Officers believe will have a high probability
of achieving long term stability (i.e. until house construction has occurred on all lots),
Council Officers may take the following matters into consideration in determining
whether the site is capable of achieving medium to long-term stability:
• evidence that the site has been effectively stabilised in the short term;
• evidence that soil has been adequately ameliorated;
• evidence that seed of annual and perennial grass species has been applied at an
adequate rate; and
• that grass seed has germinated at a density that is likely to achieve an effective
grass cover.
For example, while hydromulch can provide an immediate and effective stabilising
cover to soils, the protective cover can be relatively short-lived if vegetation fails to
establish before the thin layer of mulch decomposes. So if hydromulch is selected as
the method of temporary short term stabilisation, Council Officers will seek to confirm
that perennial as well as annual grasses are well established at the time of plan sealing
to reduce the risk of instability of the site in the medium to long term. As a general rule,
hydromulch will only be accepted as a “patch” fix and should comprise no more than
20% of the exposed site area due to the high risk of failure. Due to the requirement to
progressively stabilise exposed areas, it is not envisioned that this will present any
difficulties for an appropriately managed and compliant site.
8. PROPERTY NOTES
Not applicable.
9. VARIATION APPROVAL DETAILS
Not applicable.
10. FURTHER DEVELOPMENT PERMITS REQUIRED
Not applicable.
11. SUBMISSIONS
Not applicable.
12. RIGHTS OF APPEAL
You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the
Planning Act 2016 is attached.
During the appeal period, you as the applicant may suspend your appeal period and make written
representations to Council about the conditions contained within the development approval. If
Council agrees or agrees in part with the representations, a negotiated decision notice will be
issued. Only one negotiated decision notice may be given.
Page 7 of 9
Document Set ID: 23811958
Version: 0, Version Date: 01/01/1900
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Decision Notice - Approved by Delegation of Authority - OPW25 0073 (As Published).pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 165 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.