Cover Letter_Precinct F_CDA_FINAL

for resort facilities to be constructed upfront prior to anyone residing on the site would be unreasonable and cost
prohibitive. Where the stages are constructed sequentially, Stages 1A-1E will comprise 64 dwelling units, with a
resident population of approximately 158 people. However, we note stages may not necessarily be constructed
sequentially and therefore request the final paragraph of this condition be amended as follows (with changes
shown in bold type):

          “Where the development is staged, the common resort facilities must be completed and operational prior
          to the commencement of the use of the 64th dwelling unit.”

Condition 8

A colours and finishes palette has been submitted as part of this change request (refer dwg no. 7038-DA14). We
therefore request this condition be amended to reflect the submitted plans so as to not require submission of
further plans prior to commencement of the development.

Condition 12

A revised Bushfire Management Plan prepared by Duke Environmental has been submitted with this change
request. We therefore request this condition be deleted or amended to reflect the submitted BMP.

Condition 20

Given it is now proposed to stage the development, we request that this sunset clause be amended to allow for a
construction timeframe of 10 years. We note the original approval issued in November 2007 had a 10 year
timeframe.

Condition 33

Update to reflect new carparking numbers as per amended architectural drawings, ideally with a breakdown of
resident and visitor parking numbers provided. We note that proposed carparking numbers are in excess of the
minimum requirements for both resident and visitor parking under the Noosa Plan, and that some visitor spaces
may be removed to accommodate site works and stormwater management infrastructure. However, the number
of visitor parking spaces will not drop below the minimum required under the Noosa Plan, being 38 spaces (1 per
4 units).

In light of this, we propose the following condition wording to reflect the proposed carparking and allow some
flexibility to reduce carparking from that shown on the plans where necessary to accommodate essential
infrastructure. Proposed changes to the condition are shown in bold type:

          “Carparking shall be provided within the site generally as shown on the approved plans. Carparking shall
          include a minimum of 151 covered resident carpark spaces and a minimum of 38 visitor carpark spaces,
          including 10 clearly defined disabled carpark spaces. Motorcycle/scooter parking spaces may be
          incorporated at a rate of 4 spaces equivalent to 1 car space.”

Condition 52 & 55

We request these conditions be reworded to remove reference to the Tate Professional Engineers drawings and
instead require all internal reticulation sewers and internal private water reticulation mains to be designed and




JFP Ref: M2652/F                                                                                              Page 4