Council archive · source document
Minor Change Report MCU22 0050.01 · MCU22/0050.01
APPLICATION FOR A MINOR CHANGE TO A DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Author Graduate Development Engineer, Daniel Epps Development Assessment APPLICATION DETAILS Application No. MCU22/0050.01 Development Approval MCU22/0050 Applicant Janine Veronica Gibson and Stuart James Gibson Request Received On 14 November 2022 Report Reviewed By Mark Lewis – 12 December 2022 Decision Due Date 12 December 2022 PROPERTY DETAILS Property Address 38 Saltwater Ave Noosaville Qld 456638 Saltwater Ave Noosaville Qld 4566 RP Description Lot 322 RP 880346 Land Area 0.077 ha Existing Use of Land Residential STATUTORY DETAILS SEQRP Designation Urban Footprint Zone Low Density Residential Precinct Not applicable Local Area Plan Not applicable Overlays Acid Sulfate Soils, Flood Hazard Assessment Type Minor Change to Development Approval PROPOSAL The applicant seeks approval to change to an existing development approval for Material Change of Use and Operational Works – Landing & Jetty. The proposal is to retroactively gain approval for a change in the height of the Landing & Jetty due to concerns regarding longevity due to the height of the revetment wall being lower than originally thought. The locality and proposal plan are included below. Figure 1 – Locality Figure 2 – Site Plan Figure 3 – Elevations background A development approval for a Material Change of Use and Operational Works – Landing & Jetty was approved on 31 May 2022. The Landing & Jetty that was constructed varied from the approval and the changes were accepted as construction changes. assessment Instruments for Statutory Assessment Under the Planning Act 2016 the application must be assessed against each of the following statutory planning instruments to the extent they are relevant to the development: State Planning Policy; South East Queensland Regional Plan; Planning Regulation 2017; and The Noosa Plan 2020. Statutory Process The applicant has requested to make a minor change to a development approval under s78 of the Planning Act 2016. An application for a minor change to a development approval can only be made in circumstances where a change would constitute a ‘minor change’. The proposed change to the development approval requested by the applicant is determined to constitute a minor change on the grounds that: the development would not result in substantially different development; the change does not include prohibited development; the change would not require the application to be referred to an additional referral agency or cause a referral agency to have regard to new matters prescribed by regulation; where the original application was code assessable, the change would not cause the application to become impact assessable. Statutory Instruments – Planning Scheme The following codes from the Noosa Plan 2020 are applicable to this development: Low Density Residential Zone Code Noosaville Local Plan Code Waterways Works Code Assessment The proposal is to further raise the newly constructed Landing & Jetty due to the revetment wall having a lower R.L than originally thought. The proposal is to ensure the aluminium sub-structure of the Jetty to not permanently rest in the water. The raised level of the Landing & Jetty is considered acceptable because: no additional load will be placed on the revetment wall the longevity of the Landing & Jetty will be increased amenity will not be significantly impacted Condition 1 Approved Plans Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions. Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date JSP-SJ-35790 C Site Plan, Layout Plan & Water Allocation prepared by Edge Consulting Engineers 3 May 2022 JSP-SJ-35791 A Elevation prepared by Edge Consulting Engineers 10 January 2022 JSP-SJ-35792 C Jetty Details prepared by Edge Consulting Engineers 3 May 2022 Applicant’s Request The applicant has requested that Council approve a new plan of the Proposed Pontoon & Catwalk to reflect the construction changes. Assessment of Request Council is in support of the proposed change and it is recommended that Condition 1 be amended as follows: Approved Plans Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions. Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date JSP-SJ-35790 C Site Plan, Layout Plan & Water Allocation prepared by Edge Consulting Engineers 3 May 2022 JSP-SJ-35791 B Elevation prepared by Edge Consulting Engineers 19 October 2022 JSP-SJ-35792 C Jetty Details prepared by Edge Consulting Engineers 3 May 2022 Condition 10 General Conditions Jetties must have a level-walking surface of R.L 1.000 A.H.D or be level with the top of the revetment wall. Applicant’s Request The applicant has not specifically requested this condition to be changed. The proposed change will go above the specified R.L of 1.000 A.H.D. Assessment of Request Council is in support of changing Condition 6 to meet newly proposed A.H.D to allow for the aluminium sub-structure of the Jetty to not permanently rest in the water. It is recommended that Condition 6 be amended as follows: General Conditions Jetties must have a level-walking surface of R.L 1.295 A.H.D or be level with the top of the revetment wall. cONSULTATION Referral Agencies Not applicable Internal Council Referrals The application was forwarded to the following internal Council officers for review and/or comment: Planning: Proposal is a minor change application due to the approved Landing and Jetty having not been built in accordance with the original development permit dated 27 May 2022. Compliance Officer has investigated the matter and provided the photos, see Figure 3 and 4, and resulted in the immediate development application. The area of variation refers to the deck level above the revetment wall. Figures 1 and 2 show the variation between the original approval and proposed change, 9.5 cm of difference. The changes will ensure that the jetty is independent to the revetment wall. Figure 1 – Original Approved Plans Figure 2 – Proposed Changes Figure 3 – Photograph taken by Compliance Officer 2 Figure 4 – Photograph taken by Compliance Officer 2 No conditions are to vary from the original approval, with the exception the approved plans provided. Note: Any structures within the revetment wall setback are to be addressed through RAP20/0025.01. conclusion & reasons for decision The proposed development generally complies with the requirements of the planning scheme and does not raise any significant issues that cannot be addressed by reasonable and relevant conditions. The application is therefore recommended for approval. The report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016. RECOMMENDATION With regard to Application No. MCU22/0050.01, to make a minor change to an existing approval for Material Change of Use – Landing & Jetty situated at 38 Saltwater Ave Noosaville Qld 456638 Saltwater Ave Noosaville Qld 4566 described as Lot 322 RP 880346, Council on 9 December 2022 decided to: A. Approve the change. B. Amend conditions 1 & 10 to read as follows: Approved Plans Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions. Plan No. Rev. Plan/Document Name Date JSP-SJ-35790 C Site Plan, Layout Plan & Water Allocation prepared by Edge Consulting Engineers 3 May 2022 JSP-SJ-35791 B Elevation prepared by Edge Consulting Engineers 19 October 2022 JSP-SJ-35792 C Jetty Details prepared by Edge Consulting Engineers 3 May 2022 General Conditions Jetties must have a level-walking surface of R.L 1.295 A.H.D or be level with the top of the revetment wall. [word/footer1.xml] Page 5 of 8 [word/header1.xml] 3 [Attachment: image2.png (image text)] 3000: ‘AL. DOUBLE CHANNEL BEARER BACK TO BACK. 178 x 76 x 6.35 x 1950 LG Te p> 85 4-205 6 x CAST ALUMINIUM 7000: 350 66 x VERTICAL FENDERS MOORING CLEATS: arg: JETTY. POSITIONED IN BETWEEN 2 TIMBER PLES { ‘QUAY LU ~ To e. 1 = Pp TT g tl Tl os * 1 i Ht | g 6 x 9315 46kNm RC s DECKING 140 x 32 HID INSITU UNDERDECK PILES Il 2 {T DIRECTION OF PLANKS \ : N (AT HORZONTAL JETTY SECTION) NI ' PS coss @ 500 CRS \ p= 150 x 50 x 3 AL. RHS | NN ‘CHANNEL BEARERS y 1 o 178 x 76 x 6.35 x 1500 LG = 1 €s DECKING 140 x 32 HNO 3 1 7 8 eee 8 (AT VERTICAL JETTY SECTION) g | 8 ! ! | 3 ' 2 28 JETTY DECK i 2 a i AREA 23.3m2 | g ! | 2 4 1. + Oo REVETMENT WALL PB ——— LAYOUT PLAN SCALE 1:75 LOT 322 RP 880346 [Attachment: image3.png (image text)] 10000: Ie is HAND RAL LHS ONLY fe 10 ow REFER DETALS is LEAVE 10mm GaP 150 x 50 x 3 RS JOISTS @ 500 CRS (10 PREVENT NO LOAD FIXED TO BEARERS WITH 2 x MB SS BOLTS Nor SHOWN FOR CARTY | APPLIED TO WALL) TO-EACH 150'x 80 x 6 ANGLE BRACKET. /~ "eer eats) | 7 JETTY RL 1.205m_! APPROX 515 8m on ot on Lt 7 seeeeeeseseeefedepeceseeseseeeeeeetetetsteeeeefobs cress] RD rseeedereserbecceeneeeneesees PERO MATER LEVEL serous} 178 x 76.» 6.35 r | \ EVETUENT ELEVATION SCALE 1:50 ABPROK CANAL PROFILE 1515 ana nc_/| INSTT PLES AL, CHANNEL BEARERS FIKED TO PLES WITH 2 x M16 SS BOLTS CAST INTO PILE TOP OR CHENSET ‘3000 MIN EMBEDMENT INTO STIFF CLAY INTO DENSE SAND OR, '3500 MIN EMBEDMENT [Attachment: image4.png (image text)] 10000 HAND RAIL LHS ONLY REFER DETAILS 150 x 50 x 3 RHS JOISTS @ 500 CRS FIXED TO BEARERS WITH 2 x MB S.S BOLTS TO EACH 150 x 50 x 6 ANGLE BRACKET 347 10 GAP LEAVE 10mm GAP (TO PREVENT NO LOAD APPLIED TO WALL) (QUAY LINE DOUBLE FASCIA BOARDS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY (REFER DETAILS) APPROX 520 SAND AREA APPROX CANAL, PROFILE #*#NOTE ad TO_BE ADVISED ELEVATION SCALE 1:50 9315. 46kNM ac_/| INSITU PILES 178 x 76 x 6.35 TO PILES WITH 2 go8 go. zoe z scat 3 ed rs we RS eg Bs XL AL. CHANNEL BEARERS FIXED x M16 SS BOLTS “* CAST INTO PILE TOP OR CHEMSET see OHAT RL 0.68m seers MHWS RL 0.36m cece AND RL 0.0m LEVEL DATUM */MLWS RL 0.25m ss oLAT RL 042m [Attachment: image5.png (image text)] 10 GAP LEAVE 10mm GAP (TO PREVENT NO LOAD APPLIED TO WALL) WALL | RETAINING “4 | BOUNDARY is 3 zi ‘10000 HAND RAIL LHS ONLY REFER DETAILS 150 x 50 x 3 RHS JOISTS @ 500 CRS FIXED TO BEARERS WITH 2 x MB S.S BOLTS NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY TO EACH 150 x 50 x 6 ANGLE BRACKET 347 (QUAY LINE DOUBLE FASCIA BOARDS (REFER DETAILS) APPROX 515 \ ee REVETMENT APPROX WATER LEVEL 178 x 76 x 6.35 ‘AL. CHANNEL BEARERS FIXED TO PILES WITH 2 x M16 SS BOLTS CAST INTO PILE TOP OR CHEMSET APPROX CANAL. PROFILE
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Report MCU22 0050.01Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.6 MB (large file)
- File type
- DOCX
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.